PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is not important.
Inbox | x | |||
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN | x | |||
@GRUWUP | x | |||
@InTheMindway/[From-Myself] | x | |||
@REALUPHUMAN | x | |||
You can find the MASLOW'S CHART OF HUMAN NEEDS AT: http://esources.gruwup.netIndex of /
http://realuphuman.net/Item- http://realuphuman.net/Item- ----- Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill
========[ SIGNATURE ]============== My Name Is Martin Driskill. I
am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my
primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.--------- By given real legal given at birth is James [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ] Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
RETURNS THIS: ==== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <info@fuckeduphuman.net> Date: Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:38 PM Subject: Re: Your mail to info@fuckeduphuman.net ============================== AUTO-REPLY TO: Inquiry @RealUpHuman.net : @Gruwup.net : @MuckedUpHuman.net : @FuckedUpHuman.net This AUTO-REPLY TEXT HAS SPOKEN VOICE NARRATION AT: http://fuckeduphuman.net/inqui ==== Dear Interested or Concerned or Directly Referenced Internet User(s). The four (4) Websites that are mentioned in this header AUTO-REPLY is a set of unique internet domain name presence that has been standing in my ownership care for more than 10 years now [ Effectibcely With the Cross Over Period of October 2009 all four will be 10 years but in general these domains are for use in a triad name space not a quad naming space. Each of these internet domains are not considered at this time a coded graphical web user interface (UI) Operation but considered in terms of scientific information theory in memeitcs as "memespaces". For info, see: http://memespace.net : Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace | KurzweilAI www.kurzweilai.net › Essays Ray Kurzweil Feb 21, 2001 - Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace ..... http://www.kurzweilai.net/glob Also See Reference to Personal Information Systems and The Library Role archived at: http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr Note The Administration Ownership of these domains is: James Martin Driskilll [ Effecive Sept 1st 2016 to be known as Martin J. Driskill : Martin.J.Driskill@Gruwup.net And can be found period listed this these same Library Journal publications A Month Preior this publication. http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr September 1st 1987. And Reference This Writing on Wikiworld plrease. http://wikiworld.com/wiki/inde ---- "The pathway that the mind travels..." We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost. - An Individual Human Thought- Monday, October 14th, 1996 07:48PM PT The Birth of "In The Mindway" This is most beautiful. please give us some links if there are any. You are most welcomed. -- JimScarver And what about Truth. does anybody care about Truth? We do not know what we think we know because Truth is not absolute and it is not arbitrary. -- JimScarver Note: I may move the below information to a new page, but for right now.... You Asked, The Answer Is... I do care about truth. But as you say truth is not absolute. Not so fast, I will explain. But I wholeheartily agree truth is not arbitrary. My truth, your truth, universal truth, all can have infinite facets of TheGoodLife. Holding virtue for certain self truths or group mind truths is not an absolute moral truth. What I mean here is can we have an absolute moral truth anyway? The allaboutphilosophy : Moral Truth article [2] suggests there are many problematic situations placed upon "Moral Truth" and as such the article gives the conclusion suggestion that Moral Truth cannot be absolute. Moral Truth – Why Does It Matter? When self-interest rules, it has a profound impact on behavior, especially how we treat other human beings. The notion of human dignity depends on there being objective moral truths. Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive. With moral relativism, anything goes! The death of objective morality is filled with an “anything goes†mentality. Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it. I will directly provide a displacement view of analyst considerations to these two quotes: "Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive." "Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it." Under a memetically active system that I conceptually hold by memespace by domainnames, I profoundly disagree with this article's stance and there is something of "cultural Change" that can be placed into the record especially if there is a conflict that has arisen from one person's [or group] actions that is of self-interest which actually has or will harm others or strip away our given universal human rights including our human dignity. Let me offer the name of what I conceptually hold as possible displacement here: "Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model" goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as... "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace" vs. "Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck" Using the memespace by domain @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @muckeduphuman.net : @fuckeduphuman.net frankly just cannot be discarded and will demand the attention of the offender. The key phrase "get away with it" really cannot hold true anymore. The purpose for bringing a situation and labeling it is for "computer aided conflict resolution" where as outside of court but within this memespace to remove what is most FU about something and settle it Real Up Human and Gruw Up. This can be established first most private communications with the element of possible publicly visible real negotiations will be very apparent motivators. Verizon Already Uses phone Numbers at their Domain Think of a small application that when a phone receives a call from a particular number, the application can check the memespace for @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @fuckeduphuman.net and return a "trust" valuation instantly? As long as what is posted of information there is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH to the circumstances involved, no defamation or liable suit could be pursued. No one would want to create the paradox of placing a false story to the record when if such story could be then disproved, their identity would be immediately placed to the wrong side character and reputation. It should hold its own MORAL TRUTH Soundly. Having great responsibilities for these domains has to be properly coded. The coding of my domain mememspaces has to be full features to address the concern that is written in the wikipedia article Meme [3] Luis Benitez-Bribiesca M.D., a critic of memetics, calls the theory a "pseudoscientific dogma" and "a dangerous idea that poses a threat to the serious study of consciousness and cultural evolution". As a factual criticism, Benitez-Bribiesca points to the lack of a "code script" for memes (analogous to the DNA of genes), and to the excessive instability of the meme mutation mechanism (that of an idea going from one brain to another), which would lead to a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate, rendering the evolutionary process chaotic. I envision that Moral Truth can be absolute along with all universal truths, group mind truths, down to your truth and my truth with the proper inclusion of "code script" as mentioned. Memespace[4] The memespace is an abstract cultural container populated by memes. Memes are similar to genes and viruses in that they tend to propagate, evolve, corrupt and mutate. All these actions take place in the memespace. As a direct result, the memespace is considered volatile and prone to errors and corruption without rigorous error correction. The rigorous error correction is the exact presence on the web, the user interface to initiate a user to user communications and to define the parameters and acceptable outcomes and non-acceptable outcomes PRIVATELY FIRST and then possible PUBLIC should no agreement be reached. Should be a simple idea --- then I would like the ability for partner websites to interface with data held in mememspace. There is always the ability to CORRECT THE RECORD on any data across all pages on the internet. What our our shared responsibilities given to us? FOR THE RECORD.... Special Regards: A two fold book titled combined quote which both books can be found at Google Books. Google Book Search: [ "Go Fix Some Weighty Truth" [5]] - There are very many book title matches, ( Current Result Aug 5th 2012 About 483 Google book results (0.27 seconds) ) this is a very important true fact and not a joke. These words written a while ago should be something that guides us all, but has been lost in our world of modern society morals. I now begin with just two of the book sources which contain various versions of these same sourced words. [*] : Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors ancient and modern [6][ various authors, specific pages 37/38 ] [*] : History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter, Pennsylvania [ J.H. Beers & Co [7]: Preface ] The Combined Quotation Is: Art thou dejected? Is thy mind o'ercast? Amid her fair ones, thou the fairest choose, To Chase Thy Gloom - "Go Fix Some Weighty Truth; Chain down some passion; Do some generous good; Teach ignorance to see, or grief to smile; Correct thy friend, befriend thy greatest foe; Be just in all things; Make amends for follies past, and with warm heart forgive and be forgiven; Let work not words thy virtue prove; Go act as well as prate, and then thy counsels will be strong. Thy Reprimands Avail. THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the past ere they I elude forever his grasp, and weave them into a harmonious web to which the "art preservative" may give immortality. Therefore he, who would rescue from fast-gathering oblivion the deeds of a community, and send them on to futurity in an imperishable record, should deliver a plain, unvarnished tale. ======================= Domain Name: MUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTr Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUp Updated Date: 02-oct-2015 Creation Date: 15-oct-2009 Expiration Date: 15-oct-2016 As Soon as someone is willing to code me the necessary macro-keys... alll email addressess @muckeduphuman.net are resounded to @fuckeduphuman.net unless some one can give me a good --- very good reason why not. see: http://fuckeduphuman.net/%23Mp --- See Posts Online in reference to these domains at: http://community.gruwup.net/ /----------------------------- | LinkedIn Public Post | @Gruwup #Community #Peacebuilding : Binding Knot of Reconciliation called Mpatapo is missing in our modern world of information technologies. http://community.gruwup.net/06 http://community.gruwup.net/06 | | \----------------------------- /----------------------------- | Facebook Post : | James Driskill shared a post to Nonprofit With Balls's Timeline. May 15 · http://community.gruwup.net/06 http://community.gruwup.net/06 | | \-----------------------------  My Name Is Martin Driskill. I
am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my
primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.--------- By given real legal given at birth is James [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ] Selma to Montgomery March (1965)On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> wrote:
====== Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly. http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| @MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOL |
Jan 15, 2007 |
Are you unaware that you may be standing in a Collective Informational Quarantine?
By standing still and silent in your collective community, whatever community you might be.... A massive mischievous acts of humans might just be molding your collective community, those around you, or you directly. The MISCHIEVOUS factor of these human acts --- makes these acts wrong!
The ultimate flow of the continuing presence of these hurtful hateful few [comparitive to all of humanity] erodes us humans down our dignity, human life, and the outcome is our HUMAN DEATH.
This occurs one human death by one human death at a time --- not something that everyone might become too well aware. Not something that might result to react others to unify a revolt of change.
The oppression, persecution, and downright hatred of humans remain and will remain for quite some time of our human presence on this planet. But in of that itself --- it is no excuse to just ignore these facts.
But what is of today, those who have hateful heart to act out their wrongful deeds have been given new tools [the same tools that we have right here] to work. And of course, they still retain their old ways too. Their wrongful acts intend harm to dredge the life force out of the humans they dislike into the gutter --- and more severe into HUMAN DEATH.
And once again, I ask you with a bit more direction.
Are you sitting? You better STAND UP!
Are you still? You better WAKE UP!
Are you standing still in a Collective Informational Quarantine?
For what I know is this, the collective community in which I belong [belonged?] to --- just so has this presence fact.
I have documented it to provable circumstance.
What is written here --- and linked to what is out from here --- is what must be brought into mind working focus --- beyond any and all of the facts themselves.
This is to break the marvel -- the marvel of molding muck.
And I know for sure that I am remaining in the collective informational quarantine that will take me to death. So, when one realizes that this site's writings FALL STILL.... you might want to see the truth and answer me back this.
Do you Agree? Am I Right? Am I Wrong?
The Full Orginial Source Reference Will Be Posted Online
Reply here --- even if I I have falled down dead. I have faith that I will get your answer from whereever the afterlife is. Perhaps to rechain back a direct answer right back here from what will be my next Planet Earth reincarnation. For I am sure that multiply.com will survive the life to life transformation.
Do you have a good heart?
Do you want to finally answer me directly?
This before one of your circle peers does.
This before one of your family circle does.
Alan Horwitz @ Hayward Court Clerks Office June 21 2006 8am
Man to Man, I begged on my hands and knees : pleading
And what you were about to file with the court....
"disingenuous" was the phrase I used --- and you knew it too.
You filed that false bull shit anyway, didn't you.
These acts among many you have made against me is criminal neglict.
FBI Agent @ FBI OFfice Oakland CA June 21 2006
Man To Man : I begged on my hands and knees : pleading
To Not forget about me. His promise back was, "He Wont".
So here we go....
whatever-time : cybermark : Sharing In Kind Here : whatever-expires
Real Up Human
A Real Up Human strongly has at his or her core foundation --- Only real truth and real honesty are reliable strongholds that we must choose for ourselves to build our life upon. Forging forward in time, the core of real up humans makes aspirations to truthfully define our reality in every moment to moment we exist. First for each one human of themself and then effortlessly outward onto all others around. For all of the paths that real up humans walk, it is that walk of talk of real truth. That truth bearing our existance -- fullment -- purpose -- happiness -- in everything that was, is, or will be for real up humans. Completed work realities made whole, effortlessly done. In that whole it could never ever be gone.
I take the whatever time is needed to be a real up human to those I call friend -- and in kind return seals that friendship to me for that may be the one I most need in my final end.
by In the Mindway The universe of happiness & it's discovery is out here - it's our trip. Apr 30, 2005
In a process of not only making a statement of "good doing magic" in memetic construct.....
What I now have here defined by domain_memespace specifically is a "morality correctiveness model" goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Please remember that there is negative [evil] memetic engineering happening all around us in many many ways... In just one example, these can be simply defined by the deceptive practices found to be inherently designed into information technology of spam and phising scams.
These are humans of intelligence that are working from the understanding of science and information technology coupled with memetic human thought concepts. The intelligence factors state we must fight back against these evils by sharing in kind reply, i.e. S.I.K.H (pronounced 'seek') Sharing In Kind Here.
"However, if one cannot test for "better" empirically, the question will remain whether or not the meme concept counts as a valid scientific theory. Memetics thus remains a science in its infancy, a protoscience (to proponents) or a pseudoscience (to detractors)." [source wikipedia:meme]:
What is defined below services the utilization of validity tests:
The simple model is :
Anyone to everyone can CYBERMARK the global humanity of cyberspace or within your own private domain space [ @home or @work ]. All that is needed is to install indexing and search utilities such as
Search and personalize your computer
to search and apply a collective link to these labels in an united front against evil deeds and negative memes that are opposing humanity and global peace and reinforcing good deeds and positive memes that are supporting humanity and global peace.
I use the Internet domain place-marks as domain_memespace [or memespace by domain] or cybermark as to its "PERMANENCY" onto the humanity of change --- and ideals of IMORTALITY to each one who utilizes the collective conscience of these purposes shall not be lost --- that would be forever to the infinity of the future of all human time.
Do you think I am crazy? You are obviously suffering from meme resistance factors.
SEE:
http://www.memography.org/inde
"We propose to create memespaces for owners of domain names by the formula MEMO-TLD.DOMAIN.SUBDOMAIN.
MEMO-COM.GOOGLE and MEMO-COM.APPLE are thus automatically registered memespaces."
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some good;
Teach ignorance to see or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail.— ANON.
--| Read Source.....
When we apply the past reverence to these messages of ethics and morality that are placed into writings of others from our past human history forward into our future -- this is our duty of response to our shared humanity for all of our worldly experiences.
These are the domain_memespace of cybermark that you can apply to individual partial_thoughts to become "inclusive" by simple internal or external labeling onto your world. This follows the ideals of urbandictionary's motto : Define Your World.
partial_thoughts = "We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost."
[ in reverse chronological order of registration time]:
@MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOL
Google Meme Phrase Search [ "Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck" ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7607 International Blvd
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOLDINGMUCK.NET
Created on: 16-JUL-06
Expires on: 16-JUL-08
Last Updated on: 16-JUL-06
@GRUWUP.NET [ Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace ] [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace" ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
3260 Grande Vista
San Bernardino, CA 92405
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: GRUWUP.NET
Created on: 16-JUL-06
Expires on: 16-JUL-08
Last Updated on: 02-SEP-06
Humans [urbandictionary reference]
There are two adversary forms of humans which are the Fucked Up Human and the Real Up Human. To scale from one or the other, all humans fall somewhere in line by every action that a human makes -- even each and every last keystroke being done.
Well be real up ya all humans... ok?
by In the Mindway The universe of happiness is out here May 1, 2005
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ @FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7515 International Blvd
#308
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: FUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET
Created on: 10-JUN-05
Expires on: 11-JUN-08
Last Updated on: 06-MAY-06
How do you declare someone or someone's actions as being Fucked Up Human?
Use your creative elements and the .net is optional.
Let me pick on myself for example:
This is a person's name: [ James_Driskill@FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
This is a person's phone: [ 5105620703@FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
Or this labeling concept can be expanded with details to an actual Fucked Up Human Event:
[ Howard-SHOCK-AND-AWE---GuessWh
--- See Google Earth Placemark: @MASSIVE MISCHIEVOUS MARVEL OF MOLDING MUCK.kmz or [ View as Image Only ]
Remember --- there are no limits to memes and memespace ---you can create others in simular form for you own uses and/or share them out to the world too!
Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model
@REALUPHUMAN
@INTHEMINDWAY
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN
[UrbanDictionary Defintions]
@GRUWUP.NET : "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
@REALUPHUMAN.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ @REALUPHUMAN ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7515 International Blvd
#308
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: REALUPHUMAN.NET
Created on: 10-JUN-05
Expires on: 11-JUN-08
Last Updated on: 06-MAY-06
---
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some good;
Teach ignorance to see or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail.— ANON.
--| Read Source.....
----
"For even Christ did not please Himself." Romans 15:3
"Are you dejected? Is your mind overcast?
Go, fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion;
do some generous good;
Teach ignorance to see, or grief to smile."
--| Read Source.....
---
“Chain down some passion; do some generous deed;
Teach ignorance to see; or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
With warm heart and confidence divine,
Spring up and lay strong hold on Him who made thee.
- Young
--| Read Source.....
---
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;.
Or, with warm heart, and confidence Divine,
[PDF] "NIGHT THOUGHTS ON LIFE, DEATH, AND IMMORTALITY : IN NINE NIGHTS" by Edward Young,1683-1765
--| PDF | Read Originating Source
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
RETURNS THIS:====inquiry@fuckeduphuma..> 31-Aug-2016 23:31 42M
inquiry@fuckeduphuma..> 31-Aug-2016 19:08 20K
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@fuckeduphuman.net>
Date: Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Your mail to info@fuckeduphuman.net
================================================
AUTO-REPLY TO:
Inquiry
@RealUpHuman.net : @Gruwup.net : @MuckedUpHuman.net : @FuckedUpHuman.net
This AUTO-REPLY TEXT HAS SPOKEN VOICE NARRATION AT:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net-%20Spoken %20Voice%20Narrative%20Audio%2 0-%20Slower.mp3
====
Dear Interested or Concerned or Directly Referenced Internet User(s).
The four (4) Websites that are mentioned in this header AUTO-REPLY is a set of unique internet domain name presence that has been standing in my ownership care for more than 10 years now [ Effectibcely With the Cross Over Period of October 2009 all four will be 10 years but in general these domains are for use in a triad name space not a quad naming space.
Each of these internet domains are not considered at this time a coded graphical web user interface (UI) Operation but considered in terms of scientific information theory in memeitcs as "memespaces". For info, see: http://memespace.net :
Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace | KurzweilAI
www.kurzweilai.net › Essays
Ray Kurzweil
Feb 21, 2001 - Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace .....
http://www.kurzweilai.net/global-cyberspace-and-personal-mem espace
Also See Reference to Personal Information Systems and The Library Role archived at:
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Personal : November 1st 1987%20Information%20Systems%20the %20Library%20Role.pdf
Note The Administration Ownership of these domains is: James Martin Driskilll [ Effecive Sept 1st 2016 to be known as Martin J. Driskill : Martin.J.Driskill@Gruwup.net
And can be found period listed this these same Library Journal publications A Month Preior this publication.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Public%2 :0Access%20Microcomputer%20Serv ices%20in%20Public%20Libraries
September 1st 1987.
And Reference This Writing on Wikiworld plrease.
http://wikiworld.com/wiki/index.php/InTheMindway
----
"The pathway that the mind travels..."
We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost.
- An Individual Human Thought-
Monday, October 14th, 1996 07:48PM PT
The Birth of "In The Mindway"
This is most beautiful. please give us some links if there are any. You are most welcomed. -- JimScarver
And what about Truth. does anybody care about Truth? We do not know what we think we know because Truth is not absolute and it is not arbitrary. -- JimScarver
Note: I may move the below information to a new page, but for right now....
You Asked, The Answer Is...
I do care about truth. But as you say truth is not absolute. Not so fast, I will explain. But I wholeheartily agree truth is not arbitrary.
My truth, your truth, universal truth, all can have infinite facets of TheGoodLife. Holding virtue for certain self truths or group mind truths is not an absolute moral truth. What I mean here is can we have an absolute moral truth anyway? The allaboutphilosophy : Moral Truth article [2] suggests there are many problematic situations placed upon "Moral Truth" and as such the article gives the conclusion suggestion that Moral Truth cannot be absolute.
Moral Truth – Why Does It Matter?
When self-interest rules, it has a profound impact on behavior, especially how we treat other human beings. The notion of human dignity depends on there being objective moral truths. Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive.
With moral relativism, anything goes! The death of objective morality is filled with an “anything goes†mentality. Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it.
I will directly provide a displacement view of analyst considerations to these two quotes:
"Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive."
"Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it."
Under a memetically active system that I conceptually hold by memespace by domainnames, I profoundly disagree with this article's stance and there is something of "cultural Change" that can be placed into the record especially if there is a conflict that has arisen from one person's [or group] actions that is of self-interest which actually has or will harm others or strip away our given universal human rights including our human dignity.
Let me offer the name of what I conceptually hold as possible displacement here:
"Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model"
goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Using the memespace by domain @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @muckeduphuman.net : @fuckeduphuman.net frankly just cannot be discarded and will demand the attention of the offender. The key phrase "get away with it" really cannot hold true anymore.
The purpose for bringing a situation and labeling it is for "computer aided conflict resolution" where as outside of court but within this memespace to remove what is most FU about something and settle it Real Up Human and Gruw Up. This can be established first most private communications with the element of possible publicly visible real negotiations will be very apparent motivators.
Verizon Already Uses phone Numbers at their Domain
Think of a small application that when a phone receives
a call from a particular number, the application can check
the memespace for @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @fuckeduphuman.net
and return a "trust" valuation instantly? As long as what is posted
of information there is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH to the circumstances involved,
no defamation or liable suit could be pursued. No one would want to
create the paradox of placing a false story to the record when if such
story could be then disproved, their identity would be immediately placed
to the wrong side character and reputation.
It should hold its own MORAL TRUTH Soundly. Having great responsibilities
for these domains has to be properly coded.
The coding of my domain mememspaces has to be full features to address the concern that is written in the wikipedia article Meme [3]
Luis Benitez-Bribiesca M.D., a critic of memetics, calls the theory a "pseudoscientific dogma" and "a dangerous idea that poses a threat to the serious study of consciousness and cultural evolution". As a factual criticism, Benitez-Bribiesca points to the lack of a "code script" for memes (analogous to the DNA of genes), and to the excessive instability of the meme mutation mechanism (that of an idea going from one brain to another), which would lead to a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate, rendering the evolutionary process chaotic.
I envision that Moral Truth can be absolute along with all universal truths, group mind truths, down to your truth and my truth with the proper inclusion of "code script" as mentioned.
Memespace[4]
The memespace is an abstract cultural container populated by memes.
Memes are similar to genes and viruses in that they tend to propagate, evolve, corrupt and mutate. All these actions take place in the memespace. As a direct result, the memespace is considered volatile and prone to errors and corruption without rigorous error correction.
The rigorous error correction is the exact presence on the web, the user interface to initiate a user to user communications and to define the parameters and acceptable outcomes and non-acceptable outcomes PRIVATELY FIRST and then possible PUBLIC should no agreement be reached. Should be a simple idea --- then I would like the ability for partner websites to interface with data held in mememspace.
There is always the ability to CORRECT THE RECORD on any data across all pages on the internet. What our our shared responsibilities given to us? FOR THE RECORD....
Special Regards: A two fold book titled combined quote which both books can be found at Google Books. Google Book Search: [ "Go Fix Some Weighty Truth" [5]]
- There are very many book title matches, ( Current Result Aug 5th 2012 About 483 Google book results (0.27 seconds) ) this is a very important true fact and not a joke. These words written a while ago should be something that guides us all, but has been lost in our world of modern society morals. I now begin with just two of the book sources which contain various versions of these same sourced words.
[*] : Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors ancient and modern [6][ various authors, specific pages 37/38 ]
[*] : History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter, Pennsylvania [ J.H. Beers & Co [7]: Preface ]
The Combined Quotation Is:
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
Amid her fair ones, thou the fairest choose,
To Chase Thy Gloom -
"Go Fix Some Weighty Truth;
Chain down some passion;
Do some generous good;
Teach ignorance to see,
or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend,
befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things;
Make amends for follies past,
and with warm heart forgive and be forgiven;
Let work not words thy virtue prove;
Go act as well as prate,
and then thy counsels will be strong.
Thy Reprimands Avail.
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the past ere they I elude forever his grasp, and weave them into a harmonious web to which the "art preservative" may give immortality. Therefore he, who would rescue from fast-gathering oblivion the deeds of a community, and send them on to futurity in an imperishable record, should deliver a plain, unvarnished tale.
=======================
Domain Name: MUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET
Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 02-oct-2015
Creation Date: 15-oct-2009
Expiration Date: 15-oct-2016
As Soon as someone is willing to code me the necessary macro-keys... alll email addressess @muckeduphuman.net are resounded to @fuckeduphuman.net unless some one can give me a good --- very good reason why not.
see:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%23Mpatapo-BindingKnotOfReconcillat ion/
---
See Posts Online in reference to these domains at:
http://community.gruwup.net/
/----------------------------------------\
| LinkedIn Public Post |
@Gruwup #Community #Peacebuilding : Binding Knot of Reconciliation called Mpatapo is missing in our modern world of information technologies.
http://community.gruwup.net/06/
http://community.gruwup.net/06/SpiralHeart-AllLivesMatter.pn g
| |
\----------------------------------------/
/----------------------------------------\
| Facebook Post : |
James Driskill shared a post to Nonprofit With Balls's Timeline.
May 15 ·
http://community.gruwup.net/06A/
http://community.gruwup.net/06/SpiralHeart-AllLivesMatter.pn g
| |
\----------------------------------------/
I was born on September 1st 1965 in San Bernardino CA,My Name Is Martin Driskill.I am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
---------By given real legal given at birth isJames [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ]I was of the fetal age of 3 months when the history of race relations in the United States historical events.Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> wrote:You can find the MASLOW'S CHART OF HUMAN NEEDS AT:http://esources.gruwup.netIndex of /
Name Last modified Size Description
?/ 27-Mar-2016 06:01 -
Hiarchy-of-Needs-Det..> 05-May-2015 02:27 186K
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Personal %20Information%20Systems%20the %20Library%20Role.pdf
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
-----Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent Directory -
ButchtheDog.jpg 18-Sep-2005 09:00 68K
Dennis.Wayne.Driskill/ 27-Oct-2013 02:50 -
James-Driskill-Calif..> 17-May-2016 01:49 454K
Re-John,Sally,&James..> 19-Sep-2005 09:00 60
========[ SIGNATURE ]==============I was born on September 1st 1965 in San Bernardino CA,My Name Is Martin Driskill.I am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
---------By given real legal given at birth isJames [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ]I was of the fetal age of 3 months when the history of race relations in the United States historical events.Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
| Reply | Reply to all | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
I am now REQUIRING TO BE CALLED MARTIN as a PRIMARY NAME. Thank you.
James Martin Driskill [ :Legal Name ]
Born Sept 1st 1965, San Bernardino CA USA
--
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
nobody@gmail.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmail.com by gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c08::1a].
The error that the other server returned was:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try
550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at
550 5.1.1 https://support.google.com/
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=to:from:date:message-id:in-
:content-transfer-encoding:
:auto-submitted;
bh=9ZrUxql7HUPAmJdp+JemN6W+
b=
SQoNgn96qWWjeNJSdqLUpZ1FeEP6zf
ab1KKP64hoX9AIlbnpwOYlh9yWCB1f
09N2MOJr9Ra5iGM5X27D70J+
MMujV84Nnp4rti0/SUIrUSKEFxjda/
PYCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:
:subject:mime-version:content-
:precedence:auto-submitted;
bh=9ZrUxql7HUPAmJdp+JemN6W+
b=kv7JVPCikBoyR67+
YXTOLs1SD8mzXbTwtGcTwBkMzzbm/
azGEouiE+
YsHFSz1VH9VaCdDXu0jp9dZWrOpzfB
trCXFgF1pZXSinNMRs21mSJ73hEz0L
NsEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPGnRLjA1KX/
X-Received: by 10.55.191.2 with SMTP id p2mr15248832qkf.77.
Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: nobody@gmail.com
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:17:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG0qG0mnbwaG_MKin172-
In-Reply-To: <CAG0qG0k0u1A2xG_RbVpsEk6Z_+
References: <CAG0qG0mw+
<CAG0qG0ktwAYA8B9b+bQ8CX-
<CAG0qG0=EmnnYrxRZMEVMDUwN4u=
<CAG0qG0k0u1A2xG_RbVpsEk6Z_+
Subject: Re: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
Precedence: bulk
X-Autoreply: yes
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
----- End of message -----
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
] Personal Information..> 05-Mar-2013 06:48 1.1M ] Public Access Microc..> 18... |
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> |
to Martin.J.Drisk., Cinamon, tracy.scott |
======
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr
Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
Mama - Fire Dancer_2..> 12-Mar-2016 09:05 9.5M
Not For Publication ..> 18-Aug-2016 00:05 14M
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr
https://soundcloud.com/inthemi
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemi
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?
http://www.colorado.edu/journa
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS:
V5N1
by Marlon Riggs
To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.
(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
=====-
Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent Directory -
New VM - 0 13 minute..> 31-Aug-2016 22:56 -
Barbara-Thoensen-Col..> 16-Aug-2016 19:54 174K
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPersons%5d/Barabra.A. Thoensen/
Index of /[Persons]/Barabra.A.Thoensen
Name Last modified Size Description Parent Directory -
#Kramobone-One.Bad/ 16-Aug-2016 20:11 -
#Kramobone.The.Bad/ 16-Aug-2016 20:11 -
720-207-3988/ 16-Aug-2016 20:11 -
STOP - STOP THE HATE..> 31-Aug-2016 20:25 1.2M
STOP - STOP THE HATE..> 31-Aug-2016 20:28 - I am done speaking to the walls of silence.
I am as disbursed by all of these events as this music
video shows anger. I am angry at you all.
REFER TO ME AS BY NEW NAME
Martin J. Driskill Please
Give me a call at 720-446-7044 (if you do not want to be on
force into a recording FOR THE RECORD )
or give me a call at 307-757-8786 if you don't mind
being recorded. All recordings will be SHARE POSTED TO SOUND
CLOUD.
IN THAT .... ALL IN CC: EXPLAIN YOURSELF TO WHY I SHOULD HAVE ANY
RESPECT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATIONS BEYOND THIS POINT?
My Mom has ON THE RECORD RESPONSE HERE.
I am not delusional --- my mom is not delusional.
My case manager is not delusional.
Darrell Johnson [ of Chesney KleinJohn Apartments ]
may be suffering from some kind of relationship
bonding phobia. Jennifer of Pillar Properties [ left
un-addressed in this email as:
Darrell Johnson : [ Darrell.Johnson1@q.com ]
Jennifer Mattock [ jmattock@pillar.biz ]
ANY OF THE CC: are welcome to direct this email to them against
the misrepresentations of meeting held last week against me.
BUT - ALAS -- TRACY SCOTT AND MONICA FLYNN ARE
SUFFERING A DELUSION OF SOMETHING STRANGE AGAINST ME
AS WELL --- A BIAS THAT IS OBVIOUS FROM LISTENING
TO THE ZIP PASS-WORDED CALL RECORDING IN THIS THREAD.
I am the one whom you all should be listening to....
not them.
GO ELSEWHERE TO DENY MY HUMAN DIGNITY RIGHTS !
YOU JUST DON'T GET ME IN REALISTIC PORTIONS BASED ON
BOTH MY VERY OWN HISTORY [ PLACED HERE ] and THE FUTURE
to which you will all fall if you don't see the truth
to what I am saying in all of this -- and make
a CHANGE FOR BETTER COMMUNITY PEACE BUILDING DIRECTIONS!
Thank you for reading
Mr Martin J. Driskill
1005 Washington Street Apt 112
known as: The Awesome Kramobone Playroom
[ http://awesomekramoboneplayroom. ]gruwup.net
at
Chesney Kleinjohn Apartments [ see facebook ]
Denver CO USA 80203
A HUD SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNDER THE HOPWA FORMATION CODES
[ Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS ]
supportive of persons living with HIV/AIDS similarly to Marlon Riggs Apartments in Oakland CA
[ see: Goggle Search ]
MY COMMUNITY SPACE LEGAL AND MERIT-ABLE AND HONORABLE
AND CREATED BY ME WITH OF VIRTUE WISDOM GUIDANCE AS
FOUNDATION THOUGHTS == YOU CAN'T REMAIN THERE BLOCKED
AND NON-ABSORBED TO THE FULL INFORMATION CALLING I HAVE IN
THIS;. YOU CAN'T!
The walls outsider of my unit are suffering from
"sterile breaking non-relationship sharing disunity of
community effort affairs."
I am attempting to empower but keep getting
harassed for my tasks instead of incorporated into
the knowing RIGHT Vs WRONG [ of the noosphere where
memex was presented in 1945 and I use as a model for
emulate of MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF HUMAN NEEDS.
This both of real human life needs and real modern
technology life informational needs --- per library journal
article.
You all must be thinking CRAZY WAYS for you to consider this
way I am held under against and suppressed of a voice as
NORMALCY. I give you all more credit than just being
idiocy and idiots. You all know what I am doing here.
YOU ALL KNOW WHAT THE FUCK I AM DOING --- DON'T COWER TO
Disbelieve-able PRESENCES OF YOUR MIND AND POWERS
OF CONTROL INFLUENCES OVER ME TO DEFINE WHAT IS WRONG
WITH ME --- When there is nothing wrong with me....
the wrong is within you.
I give a caring fuck.
A Community INSIDE MY WALLS SPACE of BETTER LIVING
SHARING BREATHING LIFE OVER DEATH -- WELLNESS OVER
ILLNESS.Chesney-Kleinjohn-Ap..> 25-Aug-2016 13:15 -
Darrell Johnson - St..> 11-Feb-2016 04:13 965K
Darrell Johnson --- ..> 11-Feb-2016 03:27 11K
Darrell Johnson --- ..> 25-Aug-2016 12:02 730K
AS IT IS NOW --- AS ADDRESSED IN MY LETTER TO DARRELL JOHNSON
ON FEB 11TH 2016,
THIS IS A PLACE TO COME DIE NOT THRIVE
IF LEFT UNCHALLENGED OF THE STATUS QUO AND CHANGE.
====
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
direct YOUTUBE LINKS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OW0glOkbX0&feature=share
A Carole King Tune. Enjoy!
IF ONLY YOU WOULD SAY THAT YOU CARE.
If you don't care --- then go have sex with a robot. If you are a robot
then just fine then go be with your own robot kind, stop responding to humans.
Google Topic : Sex With Robots
Sex robots could be 'biggest trend of 2016' as more lonely humans ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
this below has:-Martin J. Driskill Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 2:08 PM"It is better to be fucked up human than dumbed down ignorant"
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016- 08-31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016- 08-17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
Howard Newsom - Phd <Howard@fapinfo.org>---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James "Real Up Human" Driskill <realuphuman.net@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 2:08 PM
Subject: It is better to be fucked up human than dumbed down ignorant.
To: rossarcher_nerdshack.com-DomainRenewalGift2007@realuphuman.n et
Cc: Ross Archer <rossarcher@nerdshack.com>, Howard Newsom - Phd <Howard@fapinfo.org>
Quote me:"It is better to be Fucked Up Human than to be dumbed down ignorant in a marvel of molding muck collective informational quarantine."-In The Mindway, Summer Solstice 2007 I prefer to be Real Up Human, don't you?Please all --- Gruw up!Thank you once again Ross.
@MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOL DINGMUCK.NET Jan 15, 2007 redirects to: http://marvelofmoldingmuck.multiply.com/
Are you unaware that you may be standing in a Collective Informational Quarantine?
By standing still and silent in your collective community, whatever community you might be.... A massive mischievous acts of humans might just be molding your collective community, those around you, or you directly. The MISCHIEVOUS factor of these human acts --- makes these acts wrong!
The ultimate flow of the continuing presence of these hurtful hateful few [comparitive to all of humanity] erodes us humans down our dignity, human life, and the outcome is our HUMAN DEATH.
This occurs one human death by one human death at a time --- not something that everyone might become too well aware. Not something that might result to react others to unify a revolt of change.
The oppression, persecution, and downright hatred of humans remain and will remain for quite some time of our human presence on this planet. But in of that itself --- it is no excuse to just ignore these facts.
But what is of today, those who have hateful heart to act out their wrongful deeds have been given new tools [the same tools that we have right here] to work. And of course, they still retain their old ways too. Their wrongful acts intend harm to dredge the life force out of the humans they dislike into the gutter --- and more severe into HUMAN DEATH.
And once again, I ask you with a bit more direction.
Are you sitting? You better STAND UP!
Are you still? You better WAKE UP!
Are you standing still in a Collective Informational Quarantine?
For what I know is this, the collective community in which I belong [belonged?] to --- just so has this presence fact.
I have documented it to provable circumstance.
What is written here --- and linked to what is out from here --- is what must be brought into mind working focus --- beyond any and all of the facts themselves.
This is to break the marvel -- the marvel of molding muck.
And I know for sure that I am remaining in the collective informational quarantine that will take me to death. So, when one realizes that this site's writings FALL STILL.... you might want to see the truth and answer me back this.Oh Kind Sir
Do you Agree? Am I Right? Am I Wrong?
The Full Orginial Source Reference Will Be Posted Online
Reply here --- even if I I have falled down dead. I have faith that I will get your answer from whereever the afterlife is. Perhaps to rechain back a direct answer right back here from what will be my next Planet Earth reincarnation. For I am sure that multiply.com will survive the life to life transformation.Witz_Law@Yahoo.com:
Do you have a good heart?
Do you want to finally answer me directly?
This before one of your circle peers does.
This before one of your family circle does.
Alan Horwitz @ Hayward Court Clerks Office June 21 2006 8am
Man to Man, I begged on my hands and knees : pleading
And what you were about to file with the court....
"disingenuous" was the phrase I used --- and you knew it too.
You filed that false bull shit anyway, didn't you.
These acts among many you have made against me is criminal neglict.
FBI Agent @ FBI OFfice Oakland CA June 21 2006
Man To Man : I begged on my hands and knees : pleading
To Not forget about me. His promise back was, "He Wont".
So here we go....Real Up Human : Humans : fucked up human
whatever-time : cybermark : Sharing In Kind Here : whatever-expires
Real Up Human
A Real Up Human strongly has at his or her core foundation --- Only real truth and real honesty are reliable strongholds that we must choose for ourselves to build our life upon. Forging forward in time, the core of real up humans makes aspirations to truthfully define our reality in every moment to moment we exist. First for each one human of themself and then effortlessly outward onto all others around. For all of the paths that real up humans walk, it is that walk of talk of real truth. That truth bearing our existance -- fullment -- purpose -- happiness -- in everything that was, is, or will be for real up humans. Completed work realities made whole, effortlessly done. In that whole it could never ever be gone.
I take the whatever time is needed to be a real up human to those I call friend -- and in kind return seals that friendship to me for that may be the one I most need in my final end.
by In the Mindway The universe of happiness & it's discovery is out here - it's our trip. Apr 30, 2005
Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace
Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model
In a process of not only making a statement of "good doing magic" in memetic construct.....
What I now have here defined by domain_memespace specifically is a "morality correctiveness model" goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Please remember that there is negative [evil] memetic engineering happening all around us in many many ways... In just one example, these can be simply defined by the deceptive practices found to be inherently designed into information technology of spam and phising scams.
These are humans of intelligence that are working from the understanding of science and information technology coupled with memetic human thought concepts. The intelligence factors state we must fight back against these evils by sharing in kind reply, i.e. S.I.K.H (pronounced 'seek') Sharing In Kind Here.
"However, if one cannot test for "better" empirically, the question will remain whether or not the meme concept counts as a valid scientific theory. Memetics thus remains a science in its infancy, a protoscience (to proponents) or a pseudoscience (to detractors)." [source wikipedia:meme]:
What is defined below services the utilization of validity tests:
The simple model is :
Anyone to everyone can CYBERMARK the global humanity of cyberspace or within your own private domain space [ @home or @work ]. All that is needed is to install indexing and search utilities such asGoogle Desktop Search
Search and personalize your computer
to search and apply a collective link to these labels in an united front against evil deeds and negative memes that are opposing humanity and global peace and reinforcing good deeds and positive memes that are supporting humanity and global peace.
I use the Internet domain place-marks as domain_memespace [or memespace by domain] or cybermark as to its "PERMANENCY" onto the humanity of change --- and ideals of IMORTALITY to each one who utilizes the collective conscience of these purposes shall not be lost --- that would be forever to the infinity of the future of all human time.
Do you think I am crazy? You are obviously suffering from meme resistance factors.
SEE:
http://www.memography.org/index.php/Memespace
"We propose to create memespaces for owners of domain names by the formula MEMO-TLD.DOMAIN.SUBDOMAIN.
MEMO-COM.GOOGLE and MEMO-COM.APPLE are thus automatically registered memespaces."
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some good;
Teach ignorance to see or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail.— ANON.
--| Read Source.....
When we apply the past reverence to these messages of ethics and morality that are placed into writings of others from our past human history forward into our future -- this is our duty of response to our shared humanity for all of our worldly experiences.
These are the domain_memespace of cybermark that you can apply to individual partial_thoughts to become "inclusive" by simple internal or external labeling onto your world. This follows the ideals of urbandictionary's motto : Define Your World.
partial_thoughts = "We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost."
[ in reverse chronological order of registration time]:
@MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOLDINGMUCK.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ "Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck" ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7607 International Blvd
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOLDINGMUCK.NET
Created on: 16-JUL-06
Expires on: 16-JUL-08
Last Updated on: 16-JUL-06
@GRUWUP.NET [ Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace ] [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace" ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
3260 Grande Vista
San Bernardino, CA 92405
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: GRUWUP.NET
Created on: 16-JUL-06
Expires on: 16-JUL-08
Last Updated on: 02-SEP-06
Humans [urbandictionary reference]
There are two adversary forms of humans which are the Fucked Up Human and the Real Up Human. To scale from one or the other, all humans fall somewhere in line by every action that a human makes -- even each and every last keystroke being done.
Well be real up ya all humans... ok?
by In the Mindway The universe of happiness is out here May 1, 2005
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ @FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7515 International Blvd
#308
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: FUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET
Created on: 10-JUN-05
Expires on: 11-JUN-08
Last Updated on: 06-MAY-06
How do you declare someone or someone's actions as being Fucked Up Human?
Use your creative elements and the .net is optional.
Let me pick on myself for example:
This is a person's name: [ James_Driskill@FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
This is a person's phone: [ 5105620703@FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
Or this labeling concept can be expanded with details to an actual Fucked Up Human Event:
[ Howard-SHOCK-AND-AWE---GuessWhat---MyCarWasStolenLastNight-R ]ightFromOutsideMyParentsHouse@ fuckeduphuman.net
--- See Google Earth Placemark: @MASSIVE MISCHIEVOUS MARVEL OF MOLDING MUCK.kmz or [ View as Image Only ]
Remember --- there are no limits to memes and memespace ---you can create others in simular form for you own uses and/or share them out to the world too!
Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model
@REALUPHUMAN
@INTHEMINDWAY
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN
[UrbanDictionary Defintions]
@GRUWUP.NET : "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
@REALUPHUMAN.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ @REALUPHUMAN ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7515 International Blvd
#308
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: REALUPHUMAN.NET
Created on: 10-JUN-05
Expires on: 11-JUN-08
Last Updated on: 06-MAY-06
---
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some good;
Teach ignorance to see or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail.— ANON.
--| Read Source.....
----
"For even Christ did not please Himself." Romans 15:3
"Are you dejected? Is your mind overcast?
Go, fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion;
do some generous good;
Teach ignorance to see, or grief to smile."
--| Read Source.....
---
“Chain down some passion; do some generous deed;
Teach ignorance to see; or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
With warm heart and confidence divine,
Spring up and lay strong hold on Him who made thee.
- Young
--| Read Source.....
---
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;.
Or, with warm heart, and confidence Divine,
[PDF] "NIGHT THOUGHTS ON LIFE, DEATH, AND IMMORTALITY : IN NINE NIGHTS" by Edward Young,1683-1765
--| PDF | Read Originating SourceTags: '89 sf quake, 911calls, accessible.com, aids, aids combat zone, aidscompetence.org, alrp.org, ann speyer, aquinas college, areyoudejected?, art and science, art preservative, aswellasprate, avi desktop capture, befriend, bejustinallthings, beneficence, bull shit, callerchoking, callermurdered, can'tfindbutchie, chaindown, christ's sympathy, city aids americas, civilization, clear appreciation, community deeds, confidencedivine, confusedlady, correctthyfriend, counselswillbestrong, crowning spirit, disinterestedness, dosome, dosomegood, education, edward young, efficacy, fapinfo.org, fellow-men, fightaids@home, fixsomeweightytruth, forfolliespast, fuckeduphuman, futurity, gay community, generousdeed, generousgood, goact, gracegems.org, grand purposes, great fortune, gruw up, gruwup, harmonious web, historian, holdonhim, illegal eviction, immortality, imperishable record, invalidattacks, isyourmindovercast?, john hopkin, laystronghold, letworknotwords, life force integrity, literature, litgothic.com, makeamends, marvelofmoldingmuck, matt the cat, mckeanelkcampot, men's hiv support, need$2forfax, needabeer, octavius winslow, onehackedprofile, orgrieftosmile, past, personal greatness, plain, prince edward island, prosperity, province, public benevolence, real up human, realuphuman, red and white, redandwhitemag, robertson library, ruth price, send them on, should deliver, somepassion, springup, st. dunston's, st. thomas, st.dunstan's, takemeaway, teachignorancetosee, team: fap, team:fap, thecenteroakland, threads, thygreatestfoe, thyvirtueprove, unceasing work, university, unvarnished tale, vitalcalifornia.org, vitallifeservices, weave, whomadethee, winslow, withwarmheart, worldcommunitygrid, young_night_thoughtsI was born on September 1st 1965 in San Bernardino CA,My Name Is Martin Driskill.I am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
---------By given real legal given at birth isJames [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ]I was of the fetal age of 3 months when the history of race relations in the United States historical events.Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> wrote:RETURNS THIS:====---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@fuckeduphuman.net>
Date: Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Your mail to info@fuckeduphuman.net
================================================
AUTO-REPLY TO:
Inquiry
@RealUpHuman.net : @Gruwup.net : @MuckedUpHuman.net : @FuckedUpHuman.net
This AUTO-REPLY TEXT HAS SPOKEN VOICE NARRATION AT:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net-%20Spoken %20Voice%20Narrative%20Audio%2 0-%20Slower.mp3
====
Dear Interested or Concerned or Directly Referenced Internet User(s).
The four (4) Websites that are mentioned in this header AUTO-REPLY is a set of unique internet domain name presence that has been standing in my ownership care for more than 10 years now [ Effectibcely With the Cross Over Period of October 2009 all four will be 10 years but in general these domains are for use in a triad name space not a quad naming space.
Each of these internet domains are not considered at this time a coded graphical web user interface (UI) Operation but considered in terms of scientific information theory in memeitcs as "memespaces". For info, see: http://memespace.net :
Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace | KurzweilAI
www.kurzweilai.net › Essays
Ray Kurzweil
Feb 21, 2001 - Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace .....
http://www.kurzweilai.net/global-cyberspace-and-personal-mem espace
Also See Reference to Personal Information Systems and The Library Role archived at:
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Personal : November 1st 1987%20Information%20Systems%20the %20Library%20Role.pdf
Note The Administration Ownership of these domains is: James Martin Driskilll [ Effecive Sept 1st 2016 to be known as Martin J. Driskill : Martin.J.Driskill@Gruwup.net
And can be found period listed this these same Library Journal publications A Month Preior this publication.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Public%2 :0Access%20Microcomputer%20Serv ices%20in%20Public%20Libraries
September 1st 1987.
And Reference This Writing on Wikiworld plrease.
http://wikiworld.com/wiki/index.php/InTheMindway
----
"The pathway that the mind travels..."
We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost.
- An Individual Human Thought-
Monday, October 14th, 1996 07:48PM PT
The Birth of "In The Mindway"
This is most beautiful. please give us some links if there are any. You are most welcomed. -- JimScarver
And what about Truth. does anybody care about Truth? We do not know what we think we know because Truth is not absolute and it is not arbitrary. -- JimScarver
Note: I may move the below information to a new page, but for right now....
You Asked, The Answer Is...
I do care about truth. But as you say truth is not absolute. Not so fast, I will explain. But I wholeheartily agree truth is not arbitrary.
My truth, your truth, universal truth, all can have infinite facets of TheGoodLife. Holding virtue for certain self truths or group mind truths is not an absolute moral truth. What I mean here is can we have an absolute moral truth anyway? The allaboutphilosophy : Moral Truth article [2] suggests there are many problematic situations placed upon "Moral Truth" and as such the article gives the conclusion suggestion that Moral Truth cannot be absolute.
Moral Truth – Why Does It Matter?
When self-interest rules, it has a profound impact on behavior, especially how we treat other human beings. The notion of human dignity depends on there being objective moral truths. Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive.
With moral relativism, anything goes! The death of objective morality is filled with an “anything goes†mentality. Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it.
I will directly provide a displacement view of analyst considerations to these two quotes:
"Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive."
"Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it."
Under a memetically active system that I conceptually hold by memespace by domainnames, I profoundly disagree with this article's stance and there is something of "cultural Change" that can be placed into the record especially if there is a conflict that has arisen from one person's [or group] actions that is of self-interest which actually has or will harm others or strip away our given universal human rights including our human dignity.
Let me offer the name of what I conceptually hold as possible displacement here:
"Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model"
goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Using the memespace by domain @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @muckeduphuman.net : @fuckeduphuman.net frankly just cannot be discarded and will demand the attention of the offender. The key phrase "get away with it" really cannot hold true anymore.
The purpose for bringing a situation and labeling it is for "computer aided conflict resolution" where as outside of court but within this memespace to remove what is most FU about something and settle it Real Up Human and Gruw Up. This can be established first most private communications with the element of possible publicly visible real negotiations will be very apparent motivators.
Verizon Already Uses phone Numbers at their Domain
Think of a small application that when a phone receives
a call from a particular number, the application can check
the memespace for @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @fuckeduphuman.net
and return a "trust" valuation instantly? As long as what is posted
of information there is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH to the circumstances involved,
no defamation or liable suit could be pursued. No one would want to
create the paradox of placing a false story to the record when if such
story could be then disproved, their identity would be immediately placed
to the wrong side character and reputation.
It should hold its own MORAL TRUTH Soundly. Having great responsibilities
for these domains has to be properly coded.
The coding of my domain mememspaces has to be full features to address the concern that is written in the wikipedia article Meme [3]
Luis Benitez-Bribiesca M.D., a critic of memetics, calls the theory a "pseudoscientific dogma" and "a dangerous idea that poses a threat to the serious study of consciousness and cultural evolution". As a factual criticism, Benitez-Bribiesca points to the lack of a "code script" for memes (analogous to the DNA of genes), and to the excessive instability of the meme mutation mechanism (that of an idea going from one brain to another), which would lead to a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate, rendering the evolutionary process chaotic.
I envision that Moral Truth can be absolute along with all universal truths, group mind truths, down to your truth and my truth with the proper inclusion of "code script" as mentioned.
Memespace[4]
The memespace is an abstract cultural container populated by memes.
Memes are similar to genes and viruses in that they tend to propagate, evolve, corrupt and mutate. All these actions take place in the memespace. As a direct result, the memespace is considered volatile and prone to errors and corruption without rigorous error correction.
The rigorous error correction is the exact presence on the web, the user interface to initiate a user to user communications and to define the parameters and acceptable outcomes and non-acceptable outcomes PRIVATELY FIRST and then possible PUBLIC should no agreement be reached. Should be a simple idea --- then I would like the ability for partner websites to interface with data held in mememspace.
There is always the ability to CORRECT THE RECORD on any data across all pages on the internet. What our our shared responsibilities given to us? FOR THE RECORD....
Special Regards: A two fold book titled combined quote which both books can be found at Google Books. Google Book Search: [ "Go Fix Some Weighty Truth" [5]]
- There are very many book title matches, ( Current Result Aug 5th 2012 About 483 Google book results (0.27 seconds) ) this is a very important true fact and not a joke. These words written a while ago should be something that guides us all, but has been lost in our world of modern society morals. I now begin with just two of the book sources which contain various versions of these same sourced words.
[*] : Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors ancient and modern [6][ various authors, specific pag
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Reply to all | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
Prejudice/ 04-Jun-2016 13:20 -
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Reply to all | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
CHAPTER ONE : TECHNOLOGY --- WE MUST UNITE A MEME WORLD COMMUNITY
==============================
==============================
CHAPTER TWO : PERFORM THE FOLLOWING
==============================
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
I am listening to the 15 part SPOKEN VOICE NARRATIVE AUDIO Mp3 FILES POWERED BY VOXDOX.
This SPOKEN VOICE IN ONE PART WILL BE FILED AS:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
The 15 part file will appear online first -- ALL LINKS VERIFIED THRU AUDIO PART 5 AS OF 3:18a as noted.
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ email: inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
Link purposefully SCRUNCHED - TO PREVENT WEB-MINING AND SPAM. This effective means you must initiate a new email inquiry yourself from the web link archive copy. However, You may user the link embedded in this Facebook post for verification of validity. Thank you..
Also note
the file [
Not%20For%20Publication%20Use%
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
=== ALL LINKS IN WRITTEN READ COPY ARE VERIFIED =====
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/…/
| Reply | Reply to all | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
standards@colorado.edu
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain colorado.edu by mx.colorado.edu. [128.138.128.150].
The error that the other server returned was:
550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:reply-to:in-
:subject:to:cc;
bh=
b=
0jzpAveAuSPFDf6rEVxgB9q9HBzcoa
0QykvSMPsv4OU6moOh14ksHOKtkrgC
jQACQsydpokKaSD4FkD33uj37I6p+
WRuReNj0B6xRfdfM44gnRvIG5nD/
0BfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-
:from:date:message-id:subject:
bh=
b=WkUus//vAilINu8j+
R7wcPmzh2qrGIoCxKIIoeCrl7ZIZWu
rk2k0CUaEAR1gGGcYGxJ3lkBi2FCMT
+Df8sy/
TGeJjwJlBn8WjZGFoEn5jBMdebtk/
JV5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPxvRE4+6+
X-Received: by 10.55.162.141 with SMTP id l135mr17369323qke.20.
Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.15.143 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: Martin.J.Driskill@
In-Reply-To: <CAG0qG0kOxUF6jNYRvgd6aeFVbaMS
References: <CAG0qG0mw+
<CAG0qG0ktwAYA8B9b+bQ8CX-
<CAG0qG0=EmnnYrxRZMEVMDUwN4u=
<CAG0qG0=KW+wQMySPPXRhCHr+
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:01:59 -0600
Message-ID: <CAG0qG0md8=2VQE0YgpbKnHaZ6iKz
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@
]
To: Martin.J.Driskill@
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.
"Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.
"tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, monica.flynn@uchealth.org,
Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>,
Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>,
"isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>,
"Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, standards@colorado.edu,
THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-
720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
==============================
CHAPTER ONE : TECHNOLOGY --- WE MUST UNITE A MEME WORLD COMMUNITY
==============================
has been sent in written form --- will be converted to SPOKEN VOICE TEXT
NARRATIVE
as in the following - IN PROCESS -- LINKS ADAPATION FACEBOOK POST FOR
CHAPTER TWO. [ Composed and Sent First ]
4 hrs <https://www.facebook.com/
Denver <https://www.facebook.com/
<https://www.facebook.com/
==============================
CHAPTER TWO : PERFORM THE FOLLOWING
==============================
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
I am listening to the 15 part SPOKEN VOICE NARRATIVE AUDIO Mp3 FILES
POWERED BY VOXDOX.
This SPOKEN VOICE IN ONE PART WILL BE FILED AS:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
<http://fuckeduphuman.net/
The 15 part file will appear online first -- ALL LINKS VERIFIED THRU AUDIO
PART 5 AS OF 3:18a as noted.
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?
----- Message truncated -----
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0084941.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:22:06 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0084941.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:16:49 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:17:08 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:27:12 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:30:05 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:29:33 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 31 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:11:27 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:11:23 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 33 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:22:38 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 33 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:23:24 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 28 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:20:18 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 33 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:27:00 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 29 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:30:49 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 30 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:47:35 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 34 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:48:30 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:01:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
==============================
CHAPTER ONE : TECHNOLOGY --- WE MUST UNITE A MEME WORLD COMMUNITY
==============================
==============================
CHAPTER TWO : PERFORM THE FOLLOWING
==============================
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
I am listening to the 15 part SPOKEN VOICE NARRATIVE AUDIO Mp3 FILES POWERED BY VOXDOX.
This SPOKEN VOICE IN ONE PART WILL BE FILED AS:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
The 15 part file will appear online first -- ALL LINKS VERIFIED THRU AUDIO PART 5 AS OF 3:18a as noted.
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ email: inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
Link purposefully SCRUNCHED - TO PREVENT WEB-MINING AND SPAM. This effective means you must initiate a new email inquiry yourself from the web link archive copy. However, You may user the link embedded in this Facebook post for verification of validity. Thank you..
Also note
the file [
Not%20For%20Publication%20Use%
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
=== ALL LINKS IN WRITTEN READ COPY ARE VERIFIED =====
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
http://fuckeduphuman.net/…/
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 29 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:48:30 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 31 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:47:01 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 29 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:54:50 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 31 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:49:49 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:50:59 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 31 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:52:30 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 34 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:54:42 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 33 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:57:52 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:15:32 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 33 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:15:32 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099696.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 34 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:20:02 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>
Cc: "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:16:03 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
] Personal Information..> 05-Mar-2013 06:48 1.1M ] Public Access Microc..> 18... |
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> |
to Martin.J.Drisk., Cinamon, tracy.scott |
======
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr
Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Pr
https://soundcloud.com/inthemi
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemi
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?
http://www.colorado.edu/journa
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS:
V5N1
by Marlon Riggs
To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.
(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%
Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPersons%5d/Barabra.A. Thoensen/
Index of /[Persons]/Barabra.A.Thoensen
Name Last modified Size Description Parent Directory -
#Kramobone-One.Bad/ 16-Aug-2016 20:11 -
#Kramobone.The.Bad/ 16-Aug-2016 20:11 -
720-207-3988/ 16-Aug-2016 20:11 -
STOP - STOP THE HATE..> 31-Aug-2016 20:25 1.2M
STOP - STOP THE HATE..> 31-Aug-2016 20:28 - I am done speaking to the walls of silence.
I am as disbursed by all of these events as this music
video shows anger. I am angry at you all.
REFER TO ME AS BY NEW NAME
Martin J. Driskill Please
Give me a call at 720-446-7044 (if you do not want to be on
force into a recording FOR THE RECORD )
or give me a call at 307-757-8786 if you don't mind
being recorded. All recordings will be SHARE POSTED TO SOUND
CLOUD.
IN THAT .... ALL IN CC: EXPLAIN YOURSELF TO WHY I SHOULD HAVE ANY
RESPECT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATIONS BEYOND THIS POINT?
My Mom has ON THE RECORD RESPONSE HERE.
I am not delusional --- my mom is not delusional.
My case manager is not delusional.
Darrell Johnson [ of Chesney KleinJohn Apartments ]
may be suffering from some kind of relationship
bonding phobia. Jennifer of Pillar Properties [ left
un-addressed in this email as:
Darrell Johnson : [ Darrell.Johnson1@q.com ]
Jennifer Mattock [ jmattock@pillar.biz ]
ANY OF THE CC: are welcome to direct this email to them against
the misrepresentations of meeting held last week against me.
BUT - ALAS -- TRACY SCOTT AND MONICA FLYNN ARE
SUFFERING A DELUSION OF SOMETHING STRANGE AGAINST ME
AS WELL --- A BIAS THAT IS OBVIOUS FROM LISTENING
TO THE ZIP PASS-WORDED CALL RECORDING IN THIS THREAD.
I am the one whom you all should be listening to....
not them.
GO ELSEWHERE TO DENY MY HUMAN DIGNITY RIGHTS !
YOU JUST DON'T GET ME IN REALISTIC PORTIONS BASED ON
BOTH MY VERY OWN HISTORY [ PLACED HERE ] and THE FUTURE
to which you will all fall if you don't see the truth
to what I am saying in all of this -- and make
a CHANGE FOR BETTER COMMUNITY PEACE BUILDING DIRECTIONS!
Thank you for reading
Mr Martin J. Driskill
1005 Washington Street Apt 112
known as: The Awesome Kramobone Playroom
[ http://awesomekramoboneplayroom. ]gruwup.net
at
Chesney Kleinjohn Apartments [ see facebook ]
Denver CO USA 80203
A HUD SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNDER THE HOPWA FORMATION CODES
[ Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS ]
supportive of persons living with HIV/AIDS similarly to Marlon Riggs Apartments in Oakland CA
[ see: Goggle Search ]
MY COMMUNITY SPACE LEGAL AND MERIT-ABLE AND HONORABLE
AND CREATED BY ME WITH OF VIRTUE WISDOM GUIDANCE AS
FOUNDATION THOUGHTS == YOU CAN'T REMAIN THERE BLOCKED
AND NON-ABSORBED TO THE FULL INFORMATION CALLING I HAVE IN
THIS;. YOU CAN'T!
The walls outsider of my unit are suffering from
"sterile breaking non-relationship sharing disunity of
community effort affairs."
I am attempting to empower but keep getting
harassed for my tasks instead of incorporated into
the knowing RIGHT Vs WRONG [ of the noosphere where
memex was presented in 1945 and I use as a model for
emulate of MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF HUMAN NEEDS.
This both of real human life needs and real modern
technology life informational needs --- per library journal
article.
You all must be thinking CRAZY WAYS for you to consider this
way I am held under against and suppressed of a voice as
NORMALCY. I give you all more credit than just being
idiocy and idiots. You all know what I am doing here.
YOU ALL KNOW WHAT THE FUCK I AM DOING --- DON'T COWER TO
Disbelieve-able PRESENCES OF YOUR MIND AND POWERS
OF CONTROL INFLUENCES OVER ME TO DEFINE WHAT IS WRONG
WITH ME --- When there is nothing wrong with me....
the wrong is within you.
I give a caring fuck.
A Community INSIDE MY WALLS SPACE of BETTER LIVING
SHARING BREATHING LIFE OVER DEATH -- WELLNESS OVER
ILLNESS.
AS IT IS NOW --- AS ADDRESSED IN MY LETTER TO DARRELL JOHNSON
ON FEB 11TH 2016,
THIS IS A PLACE TO COME DIE NOT THRIVE
IF LEFT UNCHALLENGED OF THE STATUS QUO AND CHANGE.
====
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
direct YOUTUBE LINKS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OW0glOkbX0&feature=share
A Carole King Tune. Enjoy!
IF ONLY YOU WOULD SAY THAT YOU CARE.
If you don't care --- then go have sex with a robot. If you are a robot
then just fine then go be with your own robot kind, stop responding to humans.
Google Topic : Sex With Robots
Sex robots could be 'biggest trend of 2016' as more lonely humans ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
this below has:-Martin J. Driskill Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 2:08 PM"It is better to be fucked up human than dumbed down ignorant"
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016- 08-31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016- 08-17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
Howard Newsom - Phd <Howard@fapinfo.org>---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James "Real Up Human" Driskill <realuphuman.net@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 2:08 PM
Subject: It is better to be fucked up human than dumbed down ignorant.
To: rossarcher_nerdshack.com-DomainRenewalGift2007@realuphuman.n et
Cc: Ross Archer <rossarcher@nerdshack.com>, Howard Newsom - Phd <Howard@fapinfo.org>
Quote me:"It is better to be Fucked Up Human than to be dumbed down ignorant in a marvel of molding muck collective informational quarantine."-In The Mindway, Summer Solstice 2007 I prefer to be Real Up Human, don't you?Please all --- Gruw up!Thank you once again Ross.
@MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOL DINGMUCK.NET Jan 15, 2007 redirects to: http://marvelofmoldingmuck.multiply.com/
Are you unaware that you may be standing in a Collective Informational Quarantine?
By standing still and silent in your collective community, whatever community you might be.... A massive mischievous acts of humans might just be molding your collective community, those around you, or you directly. The MISCHIEVOUS factor of these human acts --- makes these acts wrong!
The ultimate flow of the continuing presence of these hurtful hateful few [comparitive to all of humanity] erodes us humans down our dignity, human life, and the outcome is our HUMAN DEATH.
This occurs one human death by one human death at a time --- not something that everyone might become too well aware. Not something that might result to react others to unify a revolt of change.
The oppression, persecution, and downright hatred of humans remain and will remain for quite some time of our human presence on this planet. But in of that itself --- it is no excuse to just ignore these facts.
But what is of today, those who have hateful heart to act out their wrongful deeds have been given new tools [the same tools that we have right here] to work. And of course, they still retain their old ways too. Their wrongful acts intend harm to dredge the life force out of the humans they dislike into the gutter --- and more severe into HUMAN DEATH.
And once again, I ask you with a bit more direction.
Are you sitting? You better STAND UP!
Are you still? You better WAKE UP!
Are you standing still in a Collective Informational Quarantine?
For what I know is this, the collective community in which I belong [belonged?] to --- just so has this presence fact.
I have documented it to provable circumstance.
What is written here --- and linked to what is out from here --- is what must be brought into mind working focus --- beyond any and all of the facts themselves.
This is to break the marvel -- the marvel of molding muck.
And I know for sure that I am remaining in the collective informational quarantine that will take me to death. So, when one realizes that this site's writings FALL STILL.... you might want to see the truth and answer me back this.Oh Kind Sir
Do you Agree? Am I Right? Am I Wrong?
The Full Orginial Source Reference Will Be Posted Online
Reply here --- even if I I have falled down dead. I have faith that I will get your answer from whereever the afterlife is. Perhaps to rechain back a direct answer right back here from what will be my next Planet Earth reincarnation. For I am sure that multiply.com will survive the life to life transformation.Witz_Law@Yahoo.com:
Do you have a good heart?
Do you want to finally answer me directly?
This before one of your circle peers does.
This before one of your family circle does.
Alan Horwitz @ Hayward Court Clerks Office June 21 2006 8am
Man to Man, I begged on my hands and knees : pleading
And what you were about to file with the court....
"disingenuous" was the phrase I used --- and you knew it too.
You filed that false bull shit anyway, didn't you.
These acts among many you have made against me is criminal neglict.
FBI Agent @ FBI OFfice Oakland CA June 21 2006
Man To Man : I begged on my hands and knees : pleading
To Not forget about me. His promise back was, "He Wont".
So here we go....
whatever-time : cybermark : Sharing In Kind Here : whatever-expires
Real Up Human
A Real Up Human strongly has at his or her core foundation --- Only real truth and real honesty are reliable strongholds that we must choose for ourselves to build our life upon. Forging forward in time, the core of real up humans makes aspirations to truthfully define our reality in every moment to moment we exist. First for each one human of themself and then effortlessly outward onto all others around. For all of the paths that real up humans walk, it is that walk of talk of real truth. That truth bearing our existance -- fullment -- purpose -- happiness -- in everything that was, is, or will be for real up humans. Completed work realities made whole, effortlessly done. In that whole it could never ever be gone.
I take the whatever time is needed to be a real up human to those I call friend -- and in kind return seals that friendship to me for that may be the one I most need in my final end.
by In the Mindway The universe of happiness & it's discovery is out here - it's our trip. Apr 30, 2005
Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace
Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model
In a process of not only making a statement of "good doing magic" in memetic construct.....
What I now have here defined by domain_memespace specifically is a "morality correctiveness model" goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Please remember that there is negative [evil] memetic engineering happening all around us in many many ways... In just one example, these can be simply defined by the deceptive practices found to be inherently designed into information technology of spam and phising scams.
These are humans of intelligence that are working from the understanding of science and information technology coupled with memetic human thought concepts. The intelligence factors state we must fight back against these evils by sharing in kind reply, i.e. S.I.K.H (pronounced 'seek') Sharing In Kind Here.
"However, if one cannot test for "better" empirically, the question will remain whether or not the meme concept counts as a valid scientific theory. Memetics thus remains a science in its infancy, a protoscience (to proponents) or a pseudoscience (to detractors)." [source wikipedia:meme]:
What is defined below services the utilization of validity tests:
The simple model is :
Anyone to everyone can CYBERMARK the global humanity of cyberspace or within your own private domain space [ @home or @work ]. All that is needed is to install indexing and search utilities such as
Search and personalize your computer
to search and apply a collective link to these labels in an united front against evil deeds and negative memes that are opposing humanity and global peace and reinforcing good deeds and positive memes that are supporting humanity and global peace.
I use the Internet domain place-marks as domain_memespace [or memespace by domain] or cybermark as to its "PERMANENCY" onto the humanity of change --- and ideals of IMORTALITY to each one who utilizes the collective conscience of these purposes shall not be lost --- that would be forever to the infinity of the future of all human time.
Do you think I am crazy? You are obviously suffering from meme resistance factors.
SEE:
http://www.memography.org/index.php/Memespace
"We propose to create memespaces for owners of domain names by the formula MEMO-TLD.DOMAIN.SUBDOMAIN.
MEMO-COM.GOOGLE and MEMO-COM.APPLE are thus automatically registered memespaces."
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some good;
Teach ignorance to see or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail.— ANON.
--| Read Source.....
When we apply the past reverence to these messages of ethics and morality that are placed into writings of others from our past human history forward into our future -- this is our duty of response to our shared humanity for all of our worldly experiences.
These are the domain_memespace of cybermark that you can apply to individual partial_thoughts to become "inclusive" by simple internal or external labeling onto your world. This follows the ideals of urbandictionary's motto : Define Your World.
partial_thoughts = "We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost."
[ in reverse chronological order of registration time]:
@MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOLDINGMUCK.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ "Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck" ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7607 International Blvd
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: MASSIVEMISCHIEVOUSMARVELOFMOLDINGMUCK.NET
Created on: 16-JUL-06
Expires on: 16-JUL-08
Last Updated on: 16-JUL-06
@GRUWUP.NET [ Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace ] [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace" ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
3260 Grande Vista
San Bernardino, CA 92405
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: GRUWUP.NET
Created on: 16-JUL-06
Expires on: 16-JUL-08
Last Updated on: 02-SEP-06
Humans [urbandictionary reference]
There are two adversary forms of humans which are the Fucked Up Human and the Real Up Human. To scale from one or the other, all humans fall somewhere in line by every action that a human makes -- even each and every last keystroke being done.
Well be real up ya all humans... ok?
by In the Mindway The universe of happiness is out here May 1, 2005
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ @FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7515 International Blvd
#308
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: FUCKEDUPHUMAN.NET
Created on: 10-JUN-05
Expires on: 11-JUN-08
Last Updated on: 06-MAY-06
How do you declare someone or someone's actions as being Fucked Up Human?
Use your creative elements and the .net is optional.
Let me pick on myself for example:
This is a person's name: [ James_Driskill@FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
This is a person's phone: [ 5105620703@FUCKEDUPHUMAN ]
Or this labeling concept can be expanded with details to an actual Fucked Up Human Event:
[ Howard-SHOCK-AND-AWE---GuessWhat---MyCarWasStolenLastNight-R ]ightFromOutsideMyParentsHouse@ fuckeduphuman.net
--- See Google Earth Placemark: @MASSIVE MISCHIEVOUS MARVEL OF MOLDING MUCK.kmz or [ View as Image Only ]
Remember --- there are no limits to memes and memespace ---you can create others in simular form for you own uses and/or share them out to the world too!
Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model
@REALUPHUMAN
@INTHEMINDWAY
@FUCKEDUPHUMAN
[UrbanDictionary Defintions]
@GRUWUP.NET : "Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
@REALUPHUMAN.NET [whois]
Google Meme Phrase Search [ @REALUPHUMAN ]
Registrant:
In The Mindway
7515 International Blvd
#308
Oakland, CA 94621-2741
US
Registrar: NAMESDIRECT
Domain Name: REALUPHUMAN.NET
Created on: 10-JUN-05
Expires on: 11-JUN-08
Last Updated on: 06-MAY-06
---
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some good;
Teach ignorance to see or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail.— ANON.
--| Read Source.....
----
"For even Christ did not please Himself." Romans 15:3
"Are you dejected? Is your mind overcast?
Go, fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion;
do some generous good;
Teach ignorance to see, or grief to smile."
--| Read Source.....
---
“Chain down some passion; do some generous deed;
Teach ignorance to see; or grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
With warm heart and confidence divine,
Spring up and lay strong hold on Him who made thee.
- Young
--| Read Source.....
---
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;.
Or, with warm heart, and confidence Divine,
[PDF] "NIGHT THOUGHTS ON LIFE, DEATH, AND IMMORTALITY : IN NINE NIGHTS" by Edward Young,1683-1765
--| PDF | Read Originating SourceTags: '89 sf quake, 911calls, accessible.com, aids, aids combat zone, aidscompetence.org, alrp.org, ann speyer, aquinas college, areyoudejected?, art and science, art preservative, aswellasprate, avi desktop capture, befriend, bejustinallthings, beneficence, bull shit, callerchoking, callermurdered, can'tfindbutchie, chaindown, christ's sympathy, city aids americas, civilization, clear appreciation, community deeds, confidencedivine, confusedlady, correctthyfriend, counselswillbestrong, crowning spirit, disinterestedness, dosome, dosomegood, education, edward young, efficacy, fapinfo.org, fellow-men, fightaids@home, fixsomeweightytruth, forfolliespast, fuckeduphuman, futurity, gay community, generousdeed, generousgood, goact, gracegems.org, grand purposes, great fortune, gruw up, gruwup, harmonious web, historian, holdonhim, illegal eviction, immortality, imperishable record, invalidattacks, isyourmindovercast?, john hopkin, laystronghold, letworknotwords, life force integrity, literature, litgothic.com, makeamends, marvelofmoldingmuck, matt the cat, mckeanelkcampot, men's hiv support, need$2forfax, needabeer, octavius winslow, onehackedprofile, orgrieftosmile, past, personal greatness, plain, prince edward island, prosperity, province, public benevolence, real up human, realuphuman, red and white, redandwhitemag, robertson library, ruth price, send them on, should deliver, somepassion, springup, st. dunston's, st. thomas, st.dunstan's, takemeaway, teachignorancetosee, team: fap, team:fap, thecenteroakland, threads, thygreatestfoe, thyvirtueprove, unceasing work, university, unvarnished tale, vitalcalifornia.org, vitallifeservices, weave, whomadethee, winslow, withwarmheart, worldcommunitygrid, young_night_thoughtsI was born on September 1st 1965 in San Bernardino CA,My Name Is Martin Driskill.I am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
---------By given real legal given at birth isJames [ First ] Martin [ Middle ] Driskill [ Last ]I was of the fetal age of 3 months when the history of race relations in the United States historical events.Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> wrote:RETURNS THIS:====---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@fuckeduphuman.net>
Date: Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Your mail to info@fuckeduphuman.net
================================================
AUTO-REPLY TO:
Inquiry
@RealUpHuman.net : @Gruwup.net : @MuckedUpHuman.net : @FuckedUpHuman.net
This AUTO-REPLY TEXT HAS SPOKEN VOICE NARRATION AT:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net-%20Spoken %20Voice%20Narrative%20Audio%2 0-%20Slower.mp3
====
Dear Interested or Concerned or Directly Referenced Internet User(s).
The four (4) Websites that are mentioned in this header AUTO-REPLY is a set of unique internet domain name presence that has been standing in my ownership care for more than 10 years now [ Effectibcely With the Cross Over Period of October 2009 all four will be 10 years but in general these domains are for use in a triad name space not a quad naming space.
Each of these internet domains are not considered at this time a coded graphical web user interface (UI) Operation but considered in terms of scientific information theory in memeitcs as "memespaces". For info, see: http://memespace.net :
Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace | KurzweilAI
www.kurzweilai.net › Essays
Ray Kurzweil
Feb 21, 2001 - Global Cyberspace and Personal Memespace .....
http://www.kurzweilai.net/global-cyberspace-and-personal-mem espace
Also See Reference to Personal Information Systems and The Library Role archived at:
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Personal : November 1st 1987%20Information%20Systems%20the %20Library%20Role.pdf
Note The Administration Ownership of these domains is: James Martin Driskilll [ Effecive Sept 1st 2016 to be known as Martin J. Driskill : Martin.J.Driskill@Gruwup.net
And can be found period listed this these same Library Journal publications A Month Preior this publication.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Public%2 :0Access%20Microcomputer%20Serv ices%20in%20Public%20Libraries
September 1st 1987.
And Reference This Writing on Wikiworld plrease.
http://wikiworld.com/wiki/index.php/InTheMindway
----
"The pathway that the mind travels..."
We know it exists today because so many of us have personally experience it and speak about it with face to face language. We have it, but it has an unusual characteristic that provides no means of a historical chronicle should it decay to ruins. It is silent to our ears; no audio recording can exist. It is invisable to our eyes; no photographs can be taken. Can't touch it, no smell or taste. It does exist and what exists around our world usually follows either natural effects of time decay and withering away by accidental or hostile acts of destruction. Should it disappear it will be lost.
- An Individual Human Thought-
Monday, October 14th, 1996 07:48PM PT
The Birth of "In The Mindway"
This is most beautiful. please give us some links if there are any. You are most welcomed. -- JimScarver
And what about Truth. does anybody care about Truth? We do not know what we think we know because Truth is not absolute and it is not arbitrary. -- JimScarver
Note: I may move the below information to a new page, but for right now....
You Asked, The Answer Is...
I do care about truth. But as you say truth is not absolute. Not so fast, I will explain. But I wholeheartily agree truth is not arbitrary.
My truth, your truth, universal truth, all can have infinite facets of TheGoodLife. Holding virtue for certain self truths or group mind truths is not an absolute moral truth. What I mean here is can we have an absolute moral truth anyway? The allaboutphilosophy : Moral Truth article [2] suggests there are many problematic situations placed upon "Moral Truth" and as such the article gives the conclusion suggestion that Moral Truth cannot be absolute.
Moral Truth – Why Does It Matter?
When self-interest rules, it has a profound impact on behavior, especially how we treat other human beings. The notion of human dignity depends on there being objective moral truths. Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive.
With moral relativism, anything goes! The death of objective morality is filled with an “anything goes†mentality. Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it.
I will directly provide a displacement view of analyst considerations to these two quotes:
"Instead, we can discard people when they become troublesome or expensive."
"Nothing is ultimately wrong if you can get away with it."
Under a memetically active system that I conceptually hold by memespace by domainnames, I profoundly disagree with this article's stance and there is something of "cultural Change" that can be placed into the record especially if there is a conflict that has arisen from one person's [or group] actions that is of self-interest which actually has or will harm others or strip away our given universal human rights including our human dignity.
Let me offer the name of what I conceptually hold as possible displacement here:
"Applied Memetic Engineering Systems : a morality correctiveness model"
goal of positive memetic engineering that I call to action as...
"Great Reasons Urbans Will Unite Peace"
vs.
"Massive Mischievous Marvel Of Molding Muck"
Using the memespace by domain @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @muckeduphuman.net : @fuckeduphuman.net frankly just cannot be discarded and will demand the attention of the offender. The key phrase "get away with it" really cannot hold true anymore.
The purpose for bringing a situation and labeling it is for "computer aided conflict resolution" where as outside of court but within this memespace to remove what is most FU about something and settle it Real Up Human and Gruw Up. This can be established first most private communications with the element of possible publicly visible real negotiations will be very apparent motivators.
Verizon Already Uses phone Numbers at their Domain
Think of a small application that when a phone receives
a call from a particular number, the application can check
the memespace for @realuphuman.net : @gruwup.net : @fuckeduphuman.net
and return a "trust" valuation instantly? As long as what is posted
of information there is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH to the circumstances involved,
no defamation or liable suit could be pursued. No one would want to
create the paradox of placing a false story to the record when if such
story could be then disproved, their identity would be immediately placed
to the wrong side character and reputation.
It should hold its own MORAL TRUTH Soundly. Having great responsibilities
for these domains has to be properly coded.
The coding of my domain mememspaces has to be full features to address the concern that is written in the wikipedia article Meme [3]
Luis Benitez-Bribiesca M.D., a critic of memetics, calls the theory a "pseudoscientific dogma" and "a dangerous idea that poses a threat to the serious study of consciousness and cultural evolution". As a factual criticism, Benitez-Bribiesca points to the lack of a "code script" for memes (analogous to the DNA of genes), and to the excessive instability of the meme mutation mechanism (that of an idea going from one brain to another), which would lead to a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate, rendering the evolutionary process chaotic.
I envision that Moral Truth can be absolute along with all universal truths, group mind truths, down to your truth and my truth with the proper inclusion of "code script" as mentioned.
Memespace[4]
The memespace is an abstract cultural container populated by memes.
Memes are similar to genes and viruses in that they tend to propagate, evolve, corrupt and mutate. All these actions take place in the memespace. As a direct result, the memespace is considered volatile and prone to errors and corruption without rigorous error correction.
The rigorous error correction is the exact presence on the web, the user interface to initiate a user to user communications and to define the parameters and acceptable outcomes and non-acceptable outcomes PRIVATELY FIRST and then possible PUBLIC should no agreement be reached. Should be a simple idea --- then I would like the ability for partner websites to interface with data held in mememspace.
There is always the ability to CORRECT THE RECORD on any data across all pages on the internet. What our our shared responsibilities given to us? FOR THE RECORD....
Special Regards: A two fold book titled combined quote which both books can be found at Google Books. Google Book Search: [ "Go Fix Some Weighty Truth" [5]]
- There are very many book title matches, ( Current Result Aug 5th 2012 About 483 Google book results (0.27 seconds) ) this is a very important true fact and not a joke. These words written a while ago should be something that guides us all, but has been lost in our world of modern society morals. I now begin with just two of the book sources which contain various versions of these same sourced words.
[*] : Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors ancient and modern [6][ various authors, specific pag
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0084941.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
<tracy.scott@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:27:22 -0600
Final-Recipient: RFC822; tracy.scott@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:27:22 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, monica.flynn@uchealth.org, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, standards@colorado.edu, THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net, 720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 32 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:35:01 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 1 | | ||
| ||||
from m0099697.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 34 (25 max): from <inthemindway@gmail.com> via localhost, to <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; monica.flynn@uchealth.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:12:11 -0600
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
To: <Martin.J.Driskill@inthemindway.org>
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, <Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.net>, "Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, "tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, <monica.flynn@uchealth.org>, Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>, Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>, "isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>, "Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, <standards@colorado.edu>, <THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-TO-ALL-NEWS-MEDIA@realuphuman.net>, <720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net>, Jim Whitescarver <jimscarver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:12:59 -0600
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman.net ]
TODAY IS MY 51ST BIRTHDAY - SEPT 1st 2016.
This matter is only being placed to you once.
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --- NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE --- DON'T CARE WHATaddendum subject is also archived: --
Sorry Barabra.A.Thoensen TO Pick on You.... but
Confirmed in a Conversation of YESTERDAY [ Not Recorded ]. This is the
This name identity is recorded on voicemail. .
=================
Reference Article @wikiworld.org :
SocialContract
WE as individuals form collaborations called governance to meet our common interests. We agree to allow each other to live TheGoodLife in our own way as long as it doesn't interfere with our freedom to live as we wish. We have a responsibility all our collaborative activities to minimally restrict the activity or mandate actions by our individuals.
As HumanBeings Live and let live requires that we collectively protect the lives of our individuals against war, murder, and enslavement and theft of property.
Collective solutions must be evolutionary, not revolutionary in our changing world. Flexibility and diversity in our endeavors is required to make them resilient to change.
We agree all creatures have property rights to a reasonable share of our shared resources, and that we collectively have the responsibility to manage our shared resources profitably by facilitating the creation of value and discouraging the destruction of value in all our laws and policies. This amounts to sustaining our planet and economy with objective, responsible and holistic policies supporting the principle of CooperativeDiversity.
The objective methodology that allows us to build bridges and buildings that don't fall down and go safely to the moon, can and should be applied to building our future. As we learn from our mistakes the domain of problems that succumb to analysis with objective criteria to provide proven solutions to the changing needs and environment.
We must be conservative in application of objective truth in collective solutions since there is no absolute truth, truth is relative to some logical context. Our solutions must also be holistic and consider all perspectives of all problem domain and solution domain issues and stake holders.
Collective solutions must minimize intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens. We should not add complexity or demand servitude of our citizens (except in emergency).
Thus in our collaboration we consent to be driven by:
- Protecting the rights of individuals, families, and communities to live TheGoodLife and perform their SocialDuty their own way.
- Sustaining our planet.
- Promoting the creation of value.
- Investing in our long term FutureValue.
The methodology in carrying out these responsibility will include:
- Objective, Holistic, Flexible, and Diverse, and Unobtrusive criteria for our collective endeavors.
- Expert consensus validation and assessment of social, economic and environmental issues.
- Executive action by initiatives of our duly elected and appointed representatives.
- Common belief as evidenced by the majority (3/4ths needed for overriding above).
- Court system validation of collective action consistency with this social contract and protection of the rights of our individuals provided here-in.
The DeclarationOfInterdependence
is a call to action to employ objective criteria in social action to
achieve the objectives of our social contract here on earth and the MarsFrontier and beyond.
See HumanRights, AmericanVanguard, AnewGo
To be clear, as in most all WikiWorld documents, this document stands independently of referenced supporting documents which are living documents themselves not to be considered inclusions in this document.
=================
Google [ Atlantic monthly 1945 memex ] --- CORRECTION IN ARTICLE ADAPTATION
Google Search Topic [ neuroscience immortality msnbc.com ] .-- -
Also discussed in this thread in section
BUILDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ---
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
- 27,924 views
- 2 years ago
As We May Think
As Director of the Office
of Scientific Research and Development, Dr. Vannevar Bush has
coordinated the activities of some six thousand leading American
scientists in the application of science to warfare. In this significant
article he holds up an incentive for scientists when the fighting has
ceased. He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive
task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For
years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the
powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes
that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new
results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush,
instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man
access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages. The
perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of
our scientists as they emerge from their war work. Like Emerson's
famous address of 1837 on "The American Scholar," this paper by Dr. Bush
calls for a new relationship between thinking man and the sum of our
knowledge. —THE EDITOR
Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially,
**AH NOT SO FAST1945 WORDS OF WORLD SHOULD BER CORRECTED.
'Mind Uploading' & Digital Immortality May Be Reality By 2045 : Michio Kaku
but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it. In minor ways he may even improve, for his records have relative permanency. The first idea, however, to be drawn from the analogy concerns selection. Selection by association, rather than indexing, may yet be mechanized. One cannot hope thus to equal the speed and flexibility with which the mind follows an associative trail, but it should be possible to beat the mind decisively in regard to the permanence and clarity of the items resurrected from storage.
Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.
=================
The importance of the inclusion of the 1945 article as it references [ MEMEX ]
MEME 4.02
In this issue of MEME:
TECHNOREALISM
TECHNOREALISM
Over the past few months, I participated in the creation of a set of principles called "technorealism." It's a set of declarations meant to go beyond the bi-polar visions of cyber-utopianism and neo-Luddism. In another age, this would be considered a manifesto.
Now it is an open letter, a document which, through the Internet, takes on a fluid, dynamic form. Literally anyone can sign it, pass it on, and participate. Instructions on how to do this appear at the end of this message. If you like what you read, I urge you to forward it, to friends, colleagues, and other lists where appropriate.
Without further delay, let me introduce you to Technorealism.
David S. Bennahum, New York City, March 11, 1998.
In this heady age of rapid technological change, we all struggle to
maintain our bearings. The developments that unfold each day in
communications and computing can be thrilling and disorienting. One
understandable reaction is to wonder: Are these changes good or bad?
Should we welcome or fear them?
The answer is both. Technology is making life more convenient and enjoyable, and many of us healthier, wealthier, and wiser. But it is also affecting work, family, and the economy in unpredictable ways, introducing new forms of tension and distraction, and posing new threats to the cohesion of our physical communities.
Despite the complicated and often contradictory implications of technology, the conventional wisdom is woefully simplistic. Pundits, politicians, and self-appointed visionaries do us a disservice when they try to reduce these complexities to breathless tales of either high-tech doom or cyber-elation. Such polarized thinking leads to dashed hopes and unnecessary anxiety, and prevents us from understanding our own culture.
Over the past few years, even as the debate over technology has been dominated by the louder voices at the extremes, a new, more balanced consensus has quietly taken shape. This document seeks to articulate some of the shared beliefs behind that consensus, which we have come to call technorealism.
Technorealism demands that we think critically about the role that tools and interfaces play in human evolution and everyday life. Integral to this perspective is our understanding that the current tide of technological transformation, while important and powerful, is actually a continuation of waves of change that have taken place throughout history. Looking, for example, at the history of the automobile, television, or the telephone -- not just the devices but the institutions they became -- we see profound benefits as well as substantial costs. Similarly, we anticipate mixed blessings from today's emerging technologies, and expect to forever be on guard for unexpected consequences -- which must be addressed by thoughtful design and appropriate use.
As technorealists, we seek to expand the fertile middle ground between techno-utopianism and neo-Luddism. We are technology "critics" in the same way, and for the same reasons, that others are food critics, art critics, or literary critics. We can be passionately optimistic about some technologies, skeptical and disdainful of others. Still, our goal is neither to champion nor dismiss technology, but rather to understand it and apply it in a manner more consistent with basic human values.
Below are some evolving basic principles that help explain technorealism.
***
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOREALISM
1. Technologies are not neutral.
A great misconception of our time is the idea that technologies are
completely free of bias -- that because they are inanimate artifacts,
they don't promote certain kinds of behaviors over others. In truth,
technologies come loaded with both intended and unintended social,
political, and economic leanings. Every tool provides its users with a
particular manner of seeing the world and specific ways of interacting
with others. It is important for each of us to consider the biases of
various technologies and to seek out those that reflect our values and
aspirations.
2. The Internet is revolutionary, but not Utopian.
The Net is an extraordinary communications tool that provides a range of
new opportunities for people, communities, businesses, and government.
Yet as cyberspace becomes more populated, it increasingly resembles
society at large, in all its complexity. For every empowering or
enlightening aspect of the wired life, there will also be dimensions
that are malicious, perverse, or rather ordinary.
3. Government has an important role to play on the electronic frontier.
Contrary to some claims, cyberspace is not formally a place or
jurisdiction separate from Earth. While governments should respect the
rules and customs that have arisen in cyberspace, and should not stifle
this new world with inefficient regulation or censorship, it is foolish
to say that the public has no sovereignty over what an errant citizen or
fraudulent corporation does online. As the representative of the
people and the guardian of democratic values, the state has the right
and responsibility to help integrate cyberspace and conventional
society.
Technology standards and privacy issues, for example, are too important to be entrusted to the marketplace alone. Competing software firms have little interest in preserving the open standards that are essential to a fully functioning interactive network. Markets encourage innovation, but they do not necessarily insure the public interest.
4. Information is not knowledge.
All around us, information is moving faster and becoming cheaper to
acquire, and the benefits are manifest. That said, the proliferation of
data is also a serious challenge, requiring new measures of human
discipline and skepticism. We must not confuse the thrill of acquiring
or distributing information quickly with the more daunting task of
converting it into knowledge and wisdom. Regardless of how advanced our
computers become, we should never use them as a substitute for our own
basic cognitive skills of awareness, perception, reasoning, and
judgment.
5. Wiring the schools will not save them.
The problems with America's public schools -- disparate funding, social
promotion, bloated class size, crumbling infrastructure, lack of
standards -- have almost nothing to do with technology. Consequently, no
amount of technology will lead to the educational revolution prophesied
by President Clinton and others. The art of teaching cannot be
replicated by computers, the Net, or by "distance learning." These tools
can, of course, augment an already high-quality educational experience.
But to rely on them as any sort of panacea would be a costly mistake.
6. Information wants to be protected.
It's true that cyberspace and other recent developments are challenging
our copyright laws and frameworks for protecting intellectual property.
The answer, though, is not to scrap existing statutes and principles.
Instead, we must update old laws and interpretations so that information
receives roughly the same protection it did in the context of old
media. The goal is the same: to give authors sufficient control over
their work so that they have an incentive to create, while maintaining
the right of the public to make fair use of that information. In neither
context does information want "to be free." Rather, it needs to be
protected.
7. The public owns the airwaves; the public should benefit from their use.
The recent digital spectrum giveaway to broadcasters underscores the
corrupt and inefficient misuse of public resources in the arena of
technology. The citizenry should benefit and profit from the use of
public frequencies, and should retain a portion of the spectrum for
educational, cultural, and public access uses. We should demand more for
private use of public property.
8. Understanding technology should be an essential component of global citizenship.
In a world driven by the flow of information, the interfaces -- and the
underlying code -- that make information visible are becoming enormously
powerful social forces. Understanding their strengths and limitations,
and even participating in the creation of better tools, should be an
important part of being an involved citizen. These tools affect our
lives as much as laws do, and we should subject them to a similar
democratic scrutiny.
Signed (in alphabetical order),
DAVID S. BENNAHUM, New York, New York
Editor, Meme
Contributing Editor, Wired, Lingua Franca, I.D., and Spin magazines
BROOKE SHELBY BIGGS, San Francisco, California
Columnist, San Francisco Bay Guardian online
Columnist, CMP's
NetInsider
PAULINA BORSOOK, San Francisco, California
Author, "Cyberselfish: Technolibertarianism and the True Revenge of the Nerds"
(forthcoming from Broadway books)
MARISA BOWE, New York, New York
Editor-in-Chief, Word
Former Conference Manager, ECHO
SIMSON GARFINKEL, Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
Contributing Writer, Wired
Columnist, The Boston Globe
STEVEN JOHNSON, New York, New York
Author, "Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate"
Editor-In-Chief, FEED
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF, New York, New York
Author, "Cyberia," "Media Virus," "Playing the Future," and "Ecstasy Club."
Columnist, New York Times Syndicate, Time Digital
ANDREW L. SHAPIRO, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Fellow, Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Contributing Editor, The Nation
DAVID SHENK, Brooklyn, New York
Author, "Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut"
Commentator, National Public Radio
STEVE SILBERMAN, San Francisco, California
Senior Culture Writer, Wired News
MARK STAHLMAN, New York, New York
Author, "The Battle for Cyberspace" (forthcoming)
Co-founder, New York New Media Association
STEFANIE SYMAN, New York, New York
Executive editor and co-founder, FEED
JOIN US!
Technorealism is by no means an
exclusive club, but rather an attempt to spread what we think are
powerful and important ideas. To that end, we are inviting anyone and
everyone who agrees with this document to sign their own names to it by
filling out this simple form.
BROWSE an index of like-minded books, articles and essays.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12: A FEED discussion of technorealism.
COMING ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19: A conference on technorealism at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
COPYRIGHT 1998, DAVID SHENK/ANDREW L. SHAPIRO/STEVEN JOHNSON
Subscirbe to MEME via e-mail.
Visit the MEME archive with issues 1.01 forward.
Search the MEME archive for anything you want.
MEME is published by David S. Bennahum. Duplication for non-commerical use is permitted. Contact me if you have questions. Direct comments, bugs and so on to me at davidsol@panix.com.
=================
The Clincher,
Google Search [ memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes ]
There is no time to DISCONNECT AND NOT BRING FORWARD A DEBATE
OF THESE ISSUES. I hjabe technology theory solution to bring forward....
but no on cares? No oner is listening? You really ought to be listenening to me.
NO ONE IS IMMUNE TO --- AFFECTION --- AFFECTED .
Search Results
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - CBS News
New search engine exposes the "dark web" - Videos - CBS News
DARPA: Nobody's safe on the Internet - CBS News
DARPA Builds 'Memex' Deep Web Search Engine to Track Sex ...
DARPA launches Memex dark web search engine | Why We Protest ...
Deep Web / Invisible | Web Search Guide and Internet News
DARPA Testing Deep Web Search Tool - Gadget Helpline
Sotera's DataWake Browser supports DARPA MEMEX contract to fight ...
deep dark web - Search Engine - Search.com
Search | Memex search engine download free | Back Links | Hosting ...
Search | Memex search engine download | Back Links | Hosting Provider
Deep, Dark, and Digitally Controversial (Mar. 17, 2015) – Evolution of ...
Memex: US-Behörde entwickelt Suchmaschine für das Dark Web ...
The U.S. Should Dismiss UNHCR Opinion that the Migrants are ...
SBX-in-Seattle-at-Night (The Missile Defense Agency's Sea-Based X ...
The Top 5 Best Blogs on Great american bake sale san francisco - Notey
Get 60 Minutes All Access
Adwww.cbsnews.com/60-Minutes
Watch 60 Minutes Online
- Find Full Episodes, Reviews & News Watch 60 Minutes Instantly
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 31 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Searches related to memex deep dark search engine cbs 60 minutes
=========
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
Click On Link Image to Resolve QR SCAN CODE LINK.
====
http://awesomekramoboneplayroo
LISTEN presentation. Any Questions about the contents of this page can be
USE LINK FOR WORDS-TO-LIVE-BY to obtain spoken voice text narratation.
Words To Live By
Use Seach Meme :
#WordsToLiveBy
:
Facebook
:
Twitter
:
Instagram
See Also : Quality Over Quanity - No Hidden Agendas
Art thou dejected?
Is thy mind o'ercast?
To chase thy gloom,
Go fix some weighty truth;
Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
Be just in all things; make amends
For follies past, and, with warm heart,
Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
And then thy counsels will be strong,
Thy reprimands avail. —ANON
THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the
past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious
web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who
would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and
send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a
plain unvarnished tale.
[1][2]
about: Words To Live By
These Words Above Appear In These Titled Publications:
Many thoughts of many minds. Compiled by H. Southgate
by Henry Southgate - 1862...
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
1891 - Quotations, English
http://books.google.com/books?
Exercises, rules, and hints on elocution
http://books.google.com/books?
George Walter Baynham - 1881
The Poetical works of Milton, Young, Gray, Beattie, and Collins
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young, Thomas Gray - 1836
History of the Counties of McKean, Elk, Cameron and Potter
http://books.google.com/books?
J.H. Beers & Co - 1890
Much instruction from little reading: or, extracts from some of the most approved authors, ancient and modern
http://books.google.com/books?
1827
Treasury of wisdom, wit and humor, odd comparisons and proverbs:
http://books.google.com/books?
Adam Woolbever (comp.), comp Adam Woolbever - 1881
The works of the Rev. Dr. Edward Young - Volume 3
http://books.google.com/books?
Edward Young - 1811
Elegant extracts - Volumes 1-2
http://books.google.com/books?
Vicesimus Knox - 1809
Paradise lost: in twelve parts
http://books.google.com/books?
John Milton, Edward Young - 1849
Poems divine and moral: many of them now first published
http://books.google.com/books?
1821
The Cynosure: being select passages from the most distinguished writers
http://books.google.com/books?
1837
The Essays of "George Eliot"
http://books.google.com/books?
George Eliot, Nathan Sheppard - 2009
Ravensdale: A Tale - Volume 2
http://books.google.com/books?
Robert Thynne - 1845
The Universalist leader - Volume 35, Issue 43
http://books.google.com/books?
1932
AND MANY OTHER PUBLICATIONS CAN BE FOUND BY A
GOOGLE BOOKS SEARCH [ "Go fix Some Weighty Truth" ][5]
More Information Can Be Found/Discussed At This Link:
WikiWorld : WordsToLiveBy
@GRUWUP 2012 : Great Reasons Us Will Unite Peace
©2012 by James Martin Driskill, All Rights Reserved.
Contact email: WordsToLiveBy-WebPageInquires@
---------
Selma to Montgomery March (1965)
1 of 1PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@fuckeduphuman
.net ]Inboxx@FUCKEDUPHUMANx@GRUWUPx@InTheMindway/[From-Myself]x@REALUPHUMANxMartin J. Driskill11:35 PM (1 hour ago)
Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
11:40 PM (1 hour ago)
======Ms. Tracy Scott --- Please forward this to Monica Flynn. I will use the default naming email address per uchealth.org naming conventions and hopefully this will make it to her directly.I actually know what the fuck I am talking about rather than being ignorant, or delusional or even grandiose. oh boy, wow I used the F word.
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/ Index of /Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/
Veronica.Ann.Warnick Driskill
http://realuphuman.net/Item-Proofs/HISTORY-Driskill/Veronica .Ann.Warnick%20Driskill/Not%20 For%20Publication%20Use%20-%20 %20Encrypted%20Sharing%20Priva te%20Use%20as%20needed%20--%20 Mama%20-%20Fire%20Dancer_2016- 08-17_11-14-32.zip Zip Password = 5srgefwcjHGU82
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -31_19
====
https://soundcloud.com/inthemindway/mama-fire-dancer_2016-08 -17_21
I may be a pain in the ass but I am not an asshole.
Because I must lay myself on the line against the tide of #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes of harassment and other inter fearing bullshit --- one more time.... I am delusional right?BULL SHIT --- that is a statement made from those who are in the circle of past time outdated moral clauses or outdated hidden agendas I WILL NOT ALLOW TO PASS INTO MY VIEW ONE MORE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. You are being a stupid dumb fuck.... more than just dumbed down ignorant. A Dumb Fuck knows better but acts as those they don't give a flying fuck. of concern. I call this.... #FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro. html
INTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs EXCERPT:To be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools. Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense, even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of sociocultural entitlement.
hile the ideas of conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more, arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed, repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
from @Gruwup #Community #Preacebuilding Address #06
even if only held by a few bad apple actors in our society, that onto the masses these abuses if left unearthed, unnoticed, unaddressed, un-absolved will only goes to the injustices that ultimately ALL in society WILL suffer the casualties for not doing the right justice actions now today that is being called upon us and actually have been called upon us for a few generations now.(1) Eulogy of Robert F. Kennedy of June 1968 [ Audio mp3 ] through (2) Marlon Riggs' Introduction To Standards V5N1 [ Audio Pt1 Audio Pt2 Audio Conclusive Importance : Audio Accreditation ] through current era date by (3) Pope Francis Address To Congress September 2015 [ Audio Mp3 ] and now (4) President Barack Obama most recent of Sunday July 10th 2016 to LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER and (5) Hillary Clinton calls for a change in the indifference called upon our communities,.
YOU ALL --- Are you listening to me?
=====-
http://fuckeduphuman.net/%5bPhoneNumbers%5d/720-207-3988/ Index of /[PhoneNumbers]/720-207-3988
...
[Message clipped] View entire message
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 2 | | ||
| ||||
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com
Message will be retried for 1 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmail.com by gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c06::1a].
The error that the other server returned was:
452-4.2.2 The email account that you tried to reach is over quota. Please direct
452-4.2.2 the recipient to
452 4.2.2 https://support.google.com/
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:reply-to:in-
:subject:to:cc;
bh=
b=
0jzpAveAuSPFDf6rEVxgB9q9HBzcoa
0QykvSMPsv4OU6moOh14ksHOKtkrgC
jQACQsydpokKaSD4FkD33uj37I6p+
WRuReNj0B6xRfdfM44gnRvIG5nD/
0BfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-
:from:date:message-id:subject:
bh=
fkP0oqEe3UanCCvN0Fm5a7eMMJ76H9
k3lonCYcXDrTBd51X3odpQNP1ffDIy
QA9dZy+57hq8X/
fVPTOFWie8EJndWM8YN0XPJ83x0gtP
jDmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOv/
Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.15.143 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: Martin.J.Driskill@
In-Reply-To: <CAG0qG0kOxUF6jNYRvgd6aeFVbaMS
References: <CAG0qG0mw+
<CAG0qG0ktwAYA8B9b+bQ8CX-
<CAG0qG0=EmnnYrxRZMEVMDUwN4u=
<CAG0qG0=KW+wQMySPPXRhCHr+
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:01:59 -0600
Message-ID: <CAG0qG0md8=2VQE0YgpbKnHaZ6iKz
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@
]
To: Martin.J.Driskill@
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.
"Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.
"tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, monica.flynn@uchealth.org,
Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>,
Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>,
"isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>,
"Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, standards@colorado.edu,
THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-
720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
CHAPTER ONE : TECHNOLOGY --- WE MUST UNITE A MEME WORLD COMMUNITY
==============================
has been sent in written form --- will be converted to SPOKEN VOICE TEXT
NARRATIVE
as in the following - IN PROCESS -- LINKS ADAPATION FACEBOOK POST FOR
CHAPTER TWO. [ Composed and Sent First ]
4 hrs <https://www.facebook.com/
Denver <https://www.facebook.com/
<https://www.facebook.com/
==============================
CHAPTER TWO : PERFORM THE FOLLOWING
==============================
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
I am listening to the 15 part SPOKEN VOICE NARRATIVE AUDIO Mp3 FILES
POWERED BY VOXDOX.
This SPOKEN VOICE IN ONE PART WILL BE FILED AS:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
<http://fuckeduphuman.net/
The 15 part file will appear online first -- ALL LINKS VERIFIED THRU AUDIO
PART 5 AS OF 3:18a as noted.
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 3 | | ||
| ||||
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com
Message will be retried for 0 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmail.com by gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c0a::1a].
The error that the other server returned was:
452-4.2.2 The email account that you tried to reach is over quota. Please direct
452-4.2.2 the recipient to
452 4.2.2 https://support.google.com/
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:reply-to:in-
:subject:to:cc;
bh=
b=
0jzpAveAuSPFDf6rEVxgB9q9HBzcoa
0QykvSMPsv4OU6moOh14ksHOKtkrgC
jQACQsydpokKaSD4FkD33uj37I6p+
WRuReNj0B6xRfdfM44gnRvIG5nD/
0BfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-
:from:date:message-id:subject:
bh=
5lvBEINWevxFM95GuiHOw5lYQcTk0I
ybby6xtNw7vvv52V1cnoZ+
VWZDhNSX1y4ALJZjcR4ILaxaCzYa6L
m7UuHvHI/QrvIDOf0mzy/
Zh1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPj4/
Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.15.143 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: Martin.J.Driskill@
In-Reply-To: <CAG0qG0kOxUF6jNYRvgd6aeFVbaMS
References: <CAG0qG0mw+
<CAG0qG0ktwAYA8B9b+bQ8CX-
<CAG0qG0=EmnnYrxRZMEVMDUwN4u=
<CAG0qG0=KW+wQMySPPXRhCHr+
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:01:59 -0600
Message-ID: <CAG0qG0md8=2VQE0YgpbKnHaZ6iKz
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@
]
To: Martin.J.Driskill@
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.
"Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.
"tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, monica.flynn@uchealth.org,
Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>,
Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>,
"isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>,
"Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, standards@colorado.edu,
THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-
720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
CHAPTER ONE : TECHNOLOGY --- WE MUST UNITE A MEME WORLD COMMUNITY
==============================
has been sent in written form --- will be converted to SPOKEN VOICE TEXT
NARRATIVE
as in the following - IN PROCESS -- LINKS ADAPATION FACEBOOK POST FOR
CHAPTER TWO. [ Composed and Sent First ]
4 hrs <https://www.facebook.com/
Denver <https://www.facebook.com/
<https://www.facebook.com/
==============================
CHAPTER TWO : PERFORM THE FOLLOWING
==============================
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
I am listening to the 15 part SPOKEN VOICE NARRATIVE AUDIO Mp3 FILES
POWERED BY VOXDOX.
This SPOKEN VOICE IN ONE PART WILL BE FILED AS:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
<http://fuckeduphuman.net/
The 15 part file will appear online first -- ALL LINKS VERIFIED THRU AUDIO
PART 5 AS OF 3:18a as noted.
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 3 | | ||
| ||||
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com
Message will be retried for 0 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmail.com by gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c02::1a].
The error that the other server returned was:
452-4.2.2 The email account that you tried to reach is over quota. Please direct
452-4.2.2 the recipient to
452 4.2.2 https://support.google.com/
----- Original message -----
| Reply | Forward |
| Sep 4 | | ||
| ||||
blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmail.com by gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c0c::1a].
The error that the other server returned was:
452-4.2.2 The email account that you tried to reach is over quota. Please direct
452-4.2.2 the recipient to
452 4.2.2 https://support.google.com/
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:reply-to:in-
:subject:to:cc;
bh=
b=
0jzpAveAuSPFDf6rEVxgB9q9HBzcoa
0QykvSMPsv4OU6moOh14ksHOKtkrgC
jQACQsydpokKaSD4FkD33uj37I6p+
WRuReNj0B6xRfdfM44gnRvIG5nD/
0BfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-
:from:date:message-id:subject:
bh=
xqoJCk/
EleOJy4ke6x2AxtWEql/fNXZbQdmd+
myklDKaQ/9REk4EOeGZH0/
pH1eIEFTX0zUbjEGaTVY/8LGSP/
ttAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNQ4GQUgt7dgHldS/
Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.15.143 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: Martin.J.Driskill@
In-Reply-To: <CAG0qG0kOxUF6jNYRvgd6aeFVbaMS
References: <CAG0qG0mw+
<CAG0qG0ktwAYA8B9b+bQ8CX-
<CAG0qG0=EmnnYrxRZMEVMDUwN4u=
<CAG0qG0=KW+wQMySPPXRhCHr+
From: "Martin J. Driskill" <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:01:59 -0600
Message-ID: <CAG0qG0md8=2VQE0YgpbKnHaZ6iKz
Subject: Re: PERFORM THE FOLLOWING PLEASE ! [ MAILTO://inquiry@
]
To: Martin.J.Driskill@
Cc: Joy Badwound <jbadwound@gmail.com>, Martin.James.Driskill@gruwup.
"Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo" <cinamon@rockymountaincares.
"tracy.scott@uchealth.org" <tracy.scott@uchealth.org>, monica.flynn@uchealth.org,
Dennis Driskill <svtcobraman@aol.com>, Clay Darnell <coloradofrogman@yahoo.com>,
Debbie Kick <debrakick@att.net>,
"isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com Jackson" <isaacjackson.phd@gmail.com>,
"Isaac Jackson, Ph. D" <blogging.on.drugs@gmail.com>, standards@colorado.edu,
THIS-CASE-SHOULD-BE-FORWARDED-
720-207-3988@fuckeduphuman.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
CHAPTER ONE : TECHNOLOGY --- WE MUST UNITE A MEME WORLD COMMUNITY
==============================
has been sent in written form --- will be converted to SPOKEN VOICE TEXT
NARRATIVE
as in the following - IN PROCESS -- LINKS ADAPATION FACEBOOK POST FOR
CHAPTER TWO. [ Composed and Sent First ]
4 hrs <https://www.facebook.com/
Denver <https://www.facebook.com/
<https://www.facebook.com/
==============================
CHAPTER TWO : PERFORM THE FOLLOWING
==============================
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
I am listening to the 15 part SPOKEN VOICE NARRATIVE AUDIO Mp3 FILES
POWERED BY VOXDOX.
This SPOKEN VOICE IN ONE PART WILL BE FILED AS:
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
<http://fuckeduphuman.net/
The 15 part file will appear online first -- ALL LINKS VERIFIED THRU AUDIO
PART 5 AS OF 3:18a as noted.
http://fuckeduphuman.net/
| Reply | Forward |
 | Click here to Reply or Forward |