It
really is odd and curious to know that even though my outgoing name on
my email attached to this play-space here is "Makata Pond" - a unique
name identifier.... No one takes that into consideration to search for.
It is an obvious unique identifier. As well the name sounds female,
which the intended purpose of this name is in fact female but I am male
representing male photos and dialogue against this name. That should hit
someone's brain thoughts to either ask me -- or do by default what I
have is a google search placing a placing of a few items to the knowing
this out there for anyone to find.
The name is to represent what
will be the technological infusion of "moral agent" of "artificial
intelligence that can be commanded both directly inside this space or
from outside to approved honored guest to interact with into this space.
Moral Agent I say? You don't under this yet? These are up and
coming issues of importance as artificial intelligence gets more and
infused into our society and leashed out into the world. The Turing
Test" has already been passed.
The Turing test is a test,
developed by Alan Turing in 1950, of a machine's ability to exhibit
intelligent behavior equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a
human.
Anglicanism :
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2014/jun/13/computer-turing-test-humanityA computer has passed the Turing test for humanity – should we be worried?
Giles Fraser
In
essence, being human is fundamentally a moral category not a biometric
one – it is unlikely that artificial intelligence will ever surpass us
on this score
‘According to Moore's law, computers are supposed to get twice as smart every two years.’ Photograph: Blutgruppe/Corbis
Friday 13 June 2014 13.59 EDT
========
Quotation
of Importance to why I have developed a community oriented ADULT
CONCEPTS PLAYSPACE / SCHOOL in view of these emerging technologies:
So
why, you may ask, do human beings deserve this moral respect? It's not
because they can think. Or because they have language. Or even that they
have souls, whatever one of those is. Indeed, it's not because of
anything about them other than that they are human. In other words, the
essence of the category human is that it is something that demands moral
respect. And why? Answer: simply because humans are human. This
circularity feels wholly unsatisfying because we labour under the
impression that a moral attitude requires grounds beyond itself. But
understood thus, every answer to a why question gives rise to another
deeper why question, thus to an infinite regress. Where then do the
questions come to an end? Generally, in anything other that science
fiction, being human is where the questions stop. This is as deep as it
gets.
====
There is ABSOLUTELY NO MORE TIME FOR DISMISSAL
OF ATTITUDES AGAINST ME and SIMPLETON REBUTTALS TO NOT KNOW THESE FACTS
BY LIMITING ME AND/OR MY COMMUNICATIONS TO COMMUNITY LEADERSHIPS OF ALL
LEVELS OF PERSONS IN MY VIEW OF DIRECT CIRCLE OF LIVES INFLUENCE.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?
What actually do you think I am doing here in this after-all?
http://community.gruwup.net/@Gruwup :
#Community #PeacebuildingGreat Reasons Us [ You There, I Here, and Everyone Around ] Will Unite Peace.
[DIR] Computing-and-Moral Responsibility
-..> 04-Jun-2016 13:28 :
http://community.gruwup.net/Computing-and-Moral-Responsibility/And
no one wants to pay attention to this community member to listen to
calling of these foundation fore-thinking into our community.
I
am stressed to all belief and absolutely bewildered that this community
here in Denver Colorado is set out an agenda of harassment BEYOND THE
PALER against me. I have documented it and presented an opposing
justifiable position statement of concern plus new address of focus here
:
http://community.gruwup.net/06/ :
This has a SPOKEN FEMALE TEXT NARRATIVE INTERFACE ALONG SIDE THE LINKEDIN PUBLIC POST.
You
CAN'T INDEED say hello to 'Makta Pond" yet. But she does speak. She
also has a face of spokesperson role here in this space -- The Awesome
Kramobone Glows and Blows Playroom -- for which everyone cannot get
their head out of their ass and comply to the workings environment
initiation of creation work here in this space.
You guys are
absolutely insane to not interlude this intercourse with the other
intercourse kind here [sexual] being also hold in view of invitations to
my space day to day by people connecting to my posts of sexual
purposes.
This again "Moral Agency" question in the subjects of
AI is not going to go away. If you eject me out of this community as a
pariah once more/ You will have lost a GREAT OPPORTUNITY of UNITY
FORWARD for our FUTURE.
Wow----- What a statement of conclusion here.
Sincerely
open to the general public view on our informational society on the
first day of August 2016. Rent is due this week and there is a matter of
a second cycle of re-certification request of my tenant signature of
this space of new documents [ this was also done once before
legitimately timely ] since my yearly re-certification is April 1st.
Wow you guys are holding on to insanity.
My
ideals of knowing many wise things in the field study of relevance and
source presentation(s) of scholarly wise resource is at the foundation
of this space.
The future is going to unfold against us in this
moral debate here whether I am here or somewhere else or placed homeless
for the 3rd time from HOPWA HOUSING for situations disturbed of
reasoning
I made a long walk to the challenge that I am actually working something grand, great, and worthy.
http:/
alongwalkofbeauty.us : an attempt to walk from Oakland to San Bernardino was made on September 21st 2016.
Please
people get your into the reasonable current modern day life 2016
understanding before such drastic CENSORSHIP DECISIONS ARE MADE TO THE
ANNIHILATION OF US ALL.
Thank you,
Mr James M. Driskill L Apt 112
Tenant, Chesney KleinJohn Apartments
Denver Colorado USA
Where these words are posted:
http://www.colorado.edu/journals/standards/V5N1/marlonintro.htmlINTRODUCTION TO STANDARDS: V5N1
by Marlon Riggs
Americans
have always been more and at the same time less than what we pretended.
With the quickening approach of the twenty-first century, greater
numbers of us are giving testament to this inescapable fact, challenging
the cozy myths by which America has been ritually defined. Who are we?
Who are we becoming? Who and what have we been? In the next century, can
we even continue to speak (could we ever?) of a collective "we"? For
the longest, of course, these questions had simple answers.
America
was white. America was male. America was heterosexual. America was
Christian. America, above all, was a melting pot into which diverse
cultural communities gleefully descended to achieve the social and
ideological transformation necessary for inclusion within the American
Dream. That many of us--marginalized and oftentimes invisible Americans
of African, Asian, Latino and Native descent, as well as women and the
working poor--never quite melted and metamorphosized according to this
traditional prescription for social progress, hardly mattered. The great
distance between the Dream and our actual lives was not due to any
fault in the Dream: the defect was in us. The Dream thus survived
intact, its seductive power sustained by America's stubborn refusal to
look too closely at the hidden but terrible costs of "the good life" and
at who actually could--much less wanted to--afford it.
The
sixties, of course, spotlighted the complex oppressive regime of
thought, politics and culture which underlay the myth of America. For
the first time in U.S. history, the ideological fabric of white
heterosexual patriarchy was exposed for the life-constricting straight
jacket it had always been. Despite conservative attempts during
subsequent years at repair, the old social fabric has been steadily
unraveling. Thus we have arrived at this present moment, wherein a
nation historically averse to serious introspection now exhibits--in its
politics and popular media as well as its universities--an almost
obsessive reflexive preoccupation with our national identity.
To
be expected, much of the current debate is simply a re-hash of old
opinion--an attempt to forcefully rebut and undercut the de-centering
politics of radical multiculturalism (i.e., the kind of multiculturalism
where difference actually makes a differ-ence). Bring back the melting
pot. Restore "traditional values." Re-institute prayer in schools.
Preserve the primacy of Western civilization (the only one that matters
anyway). And not least, protect that critical bedrock of American
greatness, "the American family": such pronouncements reveal an intense,
even pathological desire to perpetuate a thoroughly obsolete myth of
America, and through this, a repressively orthodox system of
sociocultural entitlement.
While the ideas of
conservative/fundamentalist America are hardly new, the typically
strident pitch with which such ideas are now being argued betrays how
acutely anxious many conservatives have come to feel, due to both real
and anticipitated loss of privilege and power. What is more,
arch-conservative rhetoric--as should be evident to anyone watching our
presidential elections for the past quarter century--has found a certain
public resonance. Difference, in the traditionalist outlook, has been
regressively equated with disunity; and disunity with profound social
chaos and collapse. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so, it seems, do
many Americans with regard to the social-political myths by which they
organize and make sense of their lives. Even a fundamentally flawed,
repressive, inequitable social order seems to many better than none at
all. A clear imperative thus confronts American progressives--that
intricate (and frequently fragile) web of communities comprised of
people of color, feminists, gays and lesbians, the poor and working
class, as well as ethnic whites who value ethnicity, indeed all who have
been systematically disenfrancised and dehumanized under the once
ascendant "traditional values" of pre-Civil Rights America.
It's
no longer enough, if it ever was, to critique interlocking systems of
oppression without offering affirming alternatives of how society should
and can reconstitute itself. As we move into the inevitably more
demanding multilingual, multicultural environment--both nationally and
globally--of the next [this] century, our greatest task will be an
inversion of the commonly assumed equivalence between difference and
disunity. We must re-write this equation, demonstrating again and again
that unity does not require unanimity, that unity--that is, a sense of
social cohesion, of community--can and does derive from the expression,
comprehension, and active nurturing (and not merely tolerance or
fetishization) of difference.
This is the new standard of
civilized life that now demands our urgent labor, a new world order, if
you will, that subverts traditional conceptions of social order: a
standard which in effect subverts the meaning of the word "standard"
itself. For the new order must be comprised of multiple standards:
shifting, open-ended, dynamically transforming, so as to engender ways
of thinking and living that privilege no one set of cultural differences
over another but affirm virtue in all.
This perspective
forms the key inspiration and overarching theme in STANDARDS. Page after
page eloquently testifies to the commitment of a new generation of
America's best and brightest to shaping a radically redefined vision of
our future, where old repressive dualisms of race, class, sexuality,
gender and nationality no longer reign--a future in which not merely
some but all of us are free to explore and express our richest humanity.
Marlon Riggs
Oakland, 1992
MARLON T. RIGGS was a producer, director, and writer, who graduated
with honors from Harvard in 1978, and received the MA from UC Berkeley,
where he later taught Documentary Film in the Graduate School of
Journalism. His films include Tongues Untied, the acclaimed account of
Black gay male life; and Ethnic Notions, for which he was awarded the
Emmy. Mr. Riggs' work has been published in the anthology Brother to
Brother, as well as in arts and literary magazines, including High
Performance, Black American Literature Forum, and Art Journal. A media
activist, he testified before the U.S. Senate, and wrote extensively on
the issue of censorship. Mr. Riggs was also on the policy committee of
the national PBS, and served on various other panels, including the
National Endowment for the Arts. Marlon T. Riggs died of AIDS-related
complications in 1994. We remember him with deepest respect and
admiration.
Riggs' final film, Black Is...Black Ain't, was shown across the nation, to much acclaim.
"Introduction to STANDARDS: V5N1" © 1992, 1995 by Marlon T. Riggs.
standards@colorado.edu#BlackLivesMatter http://gruwup.net/Resources/Colorado.Edu/Marlon%20Riggs%20-%20Tongues%20Untied%20Documentary/http://gruwup.net/Resources/Colorado.Edu/Marlon%20Riggs%20-%20INTRODUCTION%20TO%20STANDARDS%20V5N1/#AllLivesMatter :
http://community.gruwup.net/06/@Gruwup
#Community #Peacebuilding : Binding Knot of Reconciliation called Mpatapo is missing in our modern world of information technologies.
Beyond
us individually [ human to human ] or [ human to human group collective
] or [ human group collective to human group collective ] what is going
to bind to the resolution of dispute of moral clause sensibility
against the[ b actions of robots of the future if we do not enable this
today URGENTLY [ between us humans individually ] ?? There is nothing on
the planet of cyber live creations but mine. !!!
Even if development is so at the initiation of conception crude.
Your misunderstanding me of my good intentions in community affairs in peace building tools is so UNREAL.
My
expectation of others so far I have tried unity interface to -- reverse
your thinking please --- There is no time for this idiotic conflict you
bestow upon me when I attempting unity and everyone upward as ONE.
PLEASE
Join me in this new future -- for it is at our door step right here
right now right today. - I am the one who has the best forward
complexity of understanding solution. I have addressed the nation
outside in my community peace building presentations of this matter
whether a local community level is listening and desires to get their
bullshit out of the way of wiser formality.
"We are sorry Mr James Driskill"
[ an apology is wholly shit due ]
"How can we help you with these efforts in community. We finally get it. We are now listening""
![[TXT]](Gmail%20-%20Hello%20%20%29_files/Nv-AN6AD_p-JbCfOjs4N3HihBvhor00FQL41JxCPF-9AWpfVKPMueWvgB_JS.gif)
![[DIR]](Gmail%20-%20Hello%20%20%29_files/-NXrPvTwoDkxv8gPJggaV7G5xQa54D6uOXRN3LCc32NUCZib6pz_5FQAW0im.gif)
![[DIR]](Gmail%20-%20Hello%20%20%29_files/tqyUwZ-G5D-zYqNqvhydDWP9viIxdkV_xToLJC_EtgIWL4hdSaus4uzRyBV2.gif)
![[SND]](Gmail%20-%20Hello%20%20%29_files/i8LTHJJsN8nWNYMBl5BjrGqWLepNDFP7wPYfBPCSlSkwqy3Nh8c7katrhpVC.gif)
James Driskill
